‘Principled Resistance’ Meets ‘ultra vires’ : NewTechniques in Opposing ECtHR Judgments

Breuer, Marten

‘Principled Resistance’ Meets ‘ultra vires’ : NewTechniques in Opposing ECtHR Judgments

Dateien

Breuer_2-1jepn44d5oopc2.pdfGröße: 379.7 KBDownloads: 70

Datum

2022

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (ZaöRV). Nomos. 2022, 82(3), pp. 641-670. ISSN 0044-2348. Available under: doi: 10.17104/0044-2348-2022-3-641

Zusammenfassung

This article engages with the most recent jurisprudential developments in Poland and discusses them against the backdrop of the doctrinal concept of ‘principled resistance’. It is submitted that the Polish Constitutional Tribunal, alongside with well-known arguments from the principled resistance background, introduced a new doctrinal argument into the Convention context, thereby borrowing the ultra vires doctrine known from the European Union (EU) context. This jurisprudence is interpreted as the endeavour to shield the sovereignty of the Polish State, and the competences of the Constitutional Tribunal, against interference from Strasbourg. At the same time, the pan- European dimension of the Polish rule of law crisis is addressed.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

340 Recht

Schlagwörter

principled resistance, ultra vires, Xero Flor, res interpretata, rule of law backsliding

Zitieren

ISO 690

BREUER, Marten, 2022. ‘Principled Resistance’ Meets ‘ultra vires’ : NewTechniques in Opposing ECtHR Judgments. In: Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (ZaöRV). Nomos. 2022, 82(3), pp. 641-670. ISSN 0044-2348. Available under: doi: 10.17104/0044-2348-2022-3-641

BibTex

@article{Breuer2022Princ-66274,
  year={2022},
  doi={10.17104/0044-2348-2022-3-641},
  title={‘Principled Resistance’ Meets ‘ultra vires’ : NewTechniques in Opposing ECtHR Judgments},
  number={3},
  volume={82},
  issn={0044-2348},
  journal={Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (ZaöRV)},
  pages={641--670},
  author={Breuer, Marten}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/66274">
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/66274/4/Breuer_2-1jepn44d5oopc2.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-03-02T14:57:05Z</dcterms:available>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/66274"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Breuer, Marten</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:title>‘Principled Resistance’ Meets ‘ultra vires’ : NewTechniques in Opposing ECtHR Judgments</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/66274/4/Breuer_2-1jepn44d5oopc2.pdf"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-03-02T14:57:05Z</dc:date>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2022</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:abstract>This article engages with the most recent jurisprudential developments in Poland and discusses them against the backdrop of the doctrinal concept of ‘principled resistance’. It is submitted that the Polish Constitutional Tribunal, alongside with well-known arguments from the principled resistance background, introduced a new doctrinal argument into the Convention context, thereby borrowing the ultra vires doctrine known from the European Union (EU) context. This jurisprudence is interpreted as the endeavour to shield the sovereignty of the Polish State, and the competences of the Constitutional Tribunal, against interference from Strasbourg. At the same time, the pan- European dimension of the Polish rule of law crisis is addressed.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Breuer, Marten</dc:creator>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Begutachtet

Ja