Publikation: ‘Principled Resistance’ Meets ‘ultra vires’ : NewTechniques in Opposing ECtHR Judgments
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
This article engages with the most recent jurisprudential developments in Poland and discusses them against the backdrop of the doctrinal concept of ‘principled resistance’. It is submitted that the Polish Constitutional Tribunal, alongside with well-known arguments from the principled resistance background, introduced a new doctrinal argument into the Convention context, thereby borrowing the ultra vires doctrine known from the European Union (EU) context. This jurisprudence is interpreted as the endeavour to shield the sovereignty of the Polish State, and the competences of the Constitutional Tribunal, against interference from Strasbourg. At the same time, the pan- European dimension of the Polish rule of law crisis is addressed.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
BREUER, Marten, 2022. ‘Principled Resistance’ Meets ‘ultra vires’ : NewTechniques in Opposing ECtHR Judgments. In: Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (ZaöRV). Nomos. 2022, 82(3), pp. 641-670. ISSN 0044-2348. Available under: doi: 10.17104/0044-2348-2022-3-641BibTex
@article{Breuer2022Princ-66274, year={2022}, doi={10.17104/0044-2348-2022-3-641}, title={‘Principled Resistance’ Meets ‘ultra vires’ : NewTechniques in Opposing ECtHR Judgments}, number={3}, volume={82}, issn={0044-2348}, journal={Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (ZaöRV)}, pages={641--670}, author={Breuer, Marten} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/66274"> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/66274/4/Breuer_2-1jepn44d5oopc2.pdf"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-03-02T14:57:05Z</dcterms:available> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/66274"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:contributor>Breuer, Marten</dc:contributor> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dcterms:title>‘Principled Resistance’ Meets ‘ultra vires’ : NewTechniques in Opposing ECtHR Judgments</dcterms:title> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/66274/4/Breuer_2-1jepn44d5oopc2.pdf"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-03-02T14:57:05Z</dc:date> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:issued>2022</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:abstract>This article engages with the most recent jurisprudential developments in Poland and discusses them against the backdrop of the doctrinal concept of ‘principled resistance’. It is submitted that the Polish Constitutional Tribunal, alongside with well-known arguments from the principled resistance background, introduced a new doctrinal argument into the Convention context, thereby borrowing the ultra vires doctrine known from the European Union (EU) context. This jurisprudence is interpreted as the endeavour to shield the sovereignty of the Polish State, and the competences of the Constitutional Tribunal, against interference from Strasbourg. At the same time, the pan- European dimension of the Polish rule of law crisis is addressed.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Breuer, Marten</dc:creator> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>