Publikation: Reliability and validity of the Test of Gross Motor Development 3 (German version) : Results
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Objective: To assess the psychometric properties of the German version of the Test of Gross Motor Development 3 (TGMD-3). Methods: Performances of 117 typically developed children (58 boys; 18 kindergarten and 99 elementary school children; Mage: 7.99 years, SD = 1.98 years) as well as 10 children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD; 8 boys; Mage: 7.88 years, SD = 1.57 years) on 12 gross motor tasks were analyzed on the basis of the respective video recordings. Results: Results indicate an excellent 2-week test–retest (N = 69; total: ICC = .983**; locomotor skills: ICC = .941**; ball skills: ICC = .977**), interrater- (2 raters; N = 30; total: ICC = .960**; locomotor skills: ICC = .884**; ball skills: ICC = .973**) as well as intrarater- (N = 30; total: ICC = .988**; locomotor skills: ICC = .972**; ball skills: ICC = .991**) reliability. Internal consistency of the two subscales (N = 110; locomotor skills: Cronbach’s α = 744; ball skills: Cronbach’s α =.890) ranges between acceptable and good. Confirmatory factor analysis provides evidence for the postulated two-factor model (N = 110; CMIN = 54.83; df = 53; p = .405; CMIN/df = 1.04; CFI = .997; RMSEA = .018; SRMR = .049). Substantial correlations between the TGMD-3 and the M-ABC 2 subscales (N = 110) indicate the presence of convergent (TGMD-3 locomotor skills × M-ABC 2 balance: r = .467**; TGMD-3 ball skills × M-ABC 2 aiming and catching: r = .436**) or divergent (TGMD-3 locomotor skills × M-ABC 2 aiming and catching: r = .334**; TGMD-3 ball skills × M-ABC 2 balance: r = .339**) validity, respectively. Indications for concurrent validity can be found in the relationship between the TGMD-3 and the German youth games total score (N = 91; r = .337**) in elementary school. Performance differences between children with and without DCD (total: F = 3.72; df = 1; p = .035; part. η2 =.171; locomotor skills: F = 4.52; df = 1; p = .024; part. η2 =.201; ball skills: F = 2.50; df = 1; p = .066; part. η2 =.122) support the clinical validity of the TGMD-3 in this subgroup. Conclusion: Our findings provide evidence for the reliability and validity of the German version of the TGMD-3.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
WAGNER, Matthias, Elizabeth Kipling WEBSTER, Dale A. ULRICH, 2015. Reliability and validity of the Test of Gross Motor Development 3 (German version) : Results. In: Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 2015, 37(Suppl.), pp. S17. ISSN 0895-2779. eISSN 1543-2904BibTex
@article{Wagner2015Relia-34822, year={2015}, title={Reliability and validity of the Test of Gross Motor Development 3 (German version) : Results}, number={Suppl.}, volume={37}, issn={0895-2779}, journal={Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology}, author={Wagner, Matthias and Webster, Elizabeth Kipling and Ulrich, Dale A.} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34822"> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:contributor>Ulrich, Dale A.</dc:contributor> <dcterms:title>Reliability and validity of the Test of Gross Motor Development 3 (German version) : Results</dcterms:title> <dc:creator>Wagner, Matthias</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Webster, Elizabeth Kipling</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2015</dcterms:issued> <dc:contributor>Wagner, Matthias</dc:contributor> <dcterms:abstract>Objective: To assess the psychometric properties of the German version of the Test of Gross Motor Development 3 (TGMD-3).
 Methods: Performances of 117 typically developed children (58 boys; 18 kindergarten and 99 elementary school children; M<sub>age</sub>: 7.99 years, SD = 1.98 years) as well as 10 children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD; 8 boys; M<sub>age</sub>: 7.88 years, SD = 1.57 years) on 12 gross motor tasks were analyzed on the basis of the respective video recordings. 
 Results: Results indicate an excellent 2-week test–retest (N = 69; total: ICC = .983**; locomotor skills: ICC = .941**; ball skills: ICC = .977**), interrater- (2 raters; N = 30; total: ICC = .960**; locomotor skills: ICC = .884**; ball skills: ICC = .973**) as well as intrarater- (N = 30; total: ICC = .988**; locomotor skills: ICC = .972**; ball skills: ICC = .991**) reliability. Internal consistency of the two subscales (N = 110; locomotor skills: Cronbach’s α = 744; ball skills: Cronbach’s α =.890) ranges between acceptable and good. Confirmatory factor analysis provides evidence for the postulated two-factor model (N = 110; CMIN = 54.83; df = 53; p = .405; CMIN/df = 1.04; CFI = .997; RMSEA = .018; SRMR = .049). Substantial correlations between the TGMD-3 and the M-ABC 2 subscales (N = 110) indicate the presence of convergent (TGMD-3 locomotor skills × M-ABC 2 balance: r = .467**; TGMD-3 ball skills × M-ABC 2 aiming and catching: r = .436**) or divergent (TGMD-3 locomotor skills × M-ABC 2 aiming and catching: r = .334**; TGMD-3 ball skills × M-ABC 2 balance: r = .339**) validity, respectively. Indications for concurrent validity can be found in the relationship between the TGMD-3 and the German youth games total score (N = 91; r = .337**) in elementary school. Performance differences between children with and without DCD (total: F = 3.72; df = 1; p = .035; part. η<sup>2</sup> =.171; locomotor skills: F = 4.52; df = 1; p = .024; part. η<sup>2</sup> =.201; ball skills: F = 2.50; df = 1; p = .066; part. η<sup>2</sup> =.122) support the clinical validity of the TGMD-3 in this subgroup. Conclusion: Our findings provide evidence for the reliability and validity of the German version of the TGMD-3.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-07-18T08:33:25Z</dc:date> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-07-18T08:33:25Z</dcterms:available> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/34822"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/35"/> <dc:creator>Ulrich, Dale A.</dc:creator> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/35"/> <dc:contributor>Webster, Elizabeth Kipling</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>