Publikation: How to talk about bioethics? : God, human dignity and embryonic stem cells in France and in the United States
Lade...
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2014
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Politique européenne. 2014, 45(3), pp. 152-174. ISSN 1623-6297. eISSN 2105-2875. Available under: doi: 10.3917/poeu.045.0152
Zusammenfassung
In liberal political theory, it is often assumed that justifications of political decisions should not make use of non-political values, especially religious ones, but only of political values. Deep moral questions, notably concerning bioethics, have however failed to meet this standard. In this paper, I argue that the distinctions between political and non-political values and between religious and secular values are blurrier than is usually acknowledged. I illustrate this claim with an analysis of arguments used in France and in the United States in debates about stem cell research.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
BARDON, Aurélia, 2014. How to talk about bioethics? : God, human dignity and embryonic stem cells in France and in the United States. In: Politique européenne. 2014, 45(3), pp. 152-174. ISSN 1623-6297. eISSN 2105-2875. Available under: doi: 10.3917/poeu.045.0152BibTex
@article{Bardon2014about-40600, year={2014}, doi={10.3917/poeu.045.0152}, title={How to talk about bioethics? : God, human dignity and embryonic stem cells in France and in the United States}, number={3}, volume={45}, issn={1623-6297}, journal={Politique européenne}, pages={152--174}, author={Bardon, Aurélia} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40600"> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/40600"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-11-13T14:45:06Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Bardon, Aurélia</dc:contributor> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In liberal political theory, it is often assumed that justifications of political decisions should not make use of non-political values, especially religious ones, but only of political values. Deep moral questions, notably concerning bioethics, have however failed to meet this standard. In this paper, I argue that the distinctions between political and non-political values and between religious and secular values are blurrier than is usually acknowledged. I illustrate this claim with an analysis of arguments used in France and in the United States in debates about stem cell research.</dcterms:abstract> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:creator>Bardon, Aurélia</dc:creator> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-11-13T14:45:06Z</dcterms:available> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dcterms:title>How to talk about bioethics? : God, human dignity and embryonic stem cells in France and in the United States</dcterms:title> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:issued>2014</dcterms:issued> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein