Memory
| dc.contributor.author | Badescu, Gruia | |
| dc.contributor.author | Trošt, Tamara | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-02-26T08:49:43Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-02-26T08:49:43Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-07-16 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Research on memory—from the cognitive and neurobiological aspects of remembering and forgetting to inquiries in the social sciences and humanities about how societies remember—is inherently interdisciplinary. The study of memory in the social sciences has gone through several waves. First, there was the foundational work on collective memory in the 1920s, led by figures such as Maurice Halbwachs and Aby Warburg, which opened the study of memory in social contexts as distinct from the cognitive study of individual memory formation. Second, the re-emergence and consolidation of memory theories within a national context in the 1980s and 1990s was shaped by the Assmanns’ theorization of cultural memory and by Pierre Nora’s work on lieux de mémoire. The transnational turn, described as the third wave, examined memory on a global scale in its entangled forms, circulating between national contexts. Finally, since the 2010s, a call has emerged for a fourth wave that focuses on the environment and its transformations, along with new work on slow memory processes. Even before memory studies was solidified as an interdisciplinary field, the study of memory had been anchored in sociology, history, and in cultural studies. Since the 2000s, anthropologists have also spoken of a memory boom in the discipline, with particular attention to practices of remembrance. Themes like trauma, violence, nostalgia, but also migration are central to understanding memory transmission, and anthropological research showcases the dynamic and evolving nature of memory and memorialization practices. | |
| dc.description.version | published | deu |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.013.645 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/76370 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.subject | collective memory | |
| dc.subject | cultural memory | |
| dc.subject | remembrance | |
| dc.subject | memory entrepreneurs | |
| dc.subject | intergeenerational | |
| dc.subject | transnational | |
| dc.subject | ruins | |
| dc.subject | destruction | |
| dc.subject | Anthropocene | |
| dc.subject | slow memory | |
| dc.subject | Histories of Anthropology | |
| dc.subject | Sociocultural Anthropology | |
| dc.subject.ddc | 900 | |
| dc.title | Memory | eng |
| dc.type | INCOLLECTION | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| kops.citation.bibtex | @incollection{Badescu2025-07-16Memor-76370,
title={Memory},
year={2025},
doi={10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.013.645},
address={Oxford},
publisher={Oxford University Press},
booktitle={Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Anthropology},
editor={Aldenderfer, Mark},
author={Badescu, Gruia and Trošt, Tamara}
} | |
| kops.citation.iso690 | BADESCU, Gruia, Tamara TROŠT, 2025. Memory. In: ALDENDERFER, Mark, Hrsg.. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Anthropology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.013.645 | deu |
| kops.citation.iso690 | BADESCU, Gruia, Tamara TROŠT, 2025. Memory. In: ALDENDERFER, Mark, ed.. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Anthropology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025. Available under: doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.013.645 | eng |
| kops.citation.rdf | <rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/76370">
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/76370"/>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/32"/>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:title>Memory</dcterms:title>
<dcterms:issued>2025-07-16</dcterms:issued>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2026-02-26T08:49:43Z</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>Trošt, Tamara</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Badescu, Gruia</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Trošt, Tamara</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Badescu, Gruia</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2026-02-26T08:49:43Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/32"/>
<dcterms:abstract>Research on memory—from the cognitive and neurobiological aspects of remembering and forgetting to inquiries in the social sciences and humanities about how societies remember—is inherently interdisciplinary. The study of memory in the social sciences has gone through several waves. First, there was the foundational work on <italic>collective memory</italic> in the 1920s, led by figures such as Maurice Halbwachs and Aby Warburg, which opened the study of memory in social contexts as distinct from the cognitive study of individual memory formation. Second, the re-emergence and consolidation of memory theories within a national context in the 1980s and 1990s was shaped by the Assmanns’ theorization of cultural memory and by Pierre Nora’s work on <italic>lieux de mémoire</italic>. The transnational turn, described as the third wave, examined memory on a global scale in its entangled forms, circulating between national contexts. Finally, since the 2010s, a call has emerged for a fourth wave that focuses on the environment and its transformations, along with new work on slow memory processes. Even before memory studies was solidified as an interdisciplinary field, the study of memory had been anchored in sociology, history, and in cultural studies. Since the 2000s, anthropologists have also spoken of a memory boom in the discipline, with particular attention to practices of remembrance. Themes like trauma, violence, nostalgia, but also migration are central to understanding memory transmission, and anthropological research showcases the dynamic and evolving nature of memory and memorialization practices.</p></dcterms:abstract>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> | |
| kops.flag.knbibliography | true | |
| kops.sourcefield | ALDENDERFER, Mark, Hrsg.. <i>Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Anthropology</i>. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.013.645 | deu |
| kops.sourcefield.plain | ALDENDERFER, Mark, Hrsg.. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Anthropology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.013.645 | deu |
| kops.sourcefield.plain | ALDENDERFER, Mark, ed.. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Anthropology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025. Available under: doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.013.645 | eng |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 31c481c6-a535-4003-a238-070dbb7ec7a2 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 31c481c6-a535-4003-a238-070dbb7ec7a2 | |
| source.contributor.editor | Aldenderfer, Mark | |
| source.publisher | Oxford University Press | |
| source.publisher.location | Oxford | |
| source.title | Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Anthropology | |
| temp.internal.duplicates | items/8716854f-054e-46e0-92da-9c85ddae52f7;true;Memory | |
| temp.internal.duplicates | items/76f1c628-187e-41df-aa60-5fe01503e315;true;Architects as Memory Actors : Ruins, Reconstructions, and Memorials in Belgrade | |
| temp.internal.duplicates | items/f42d5bff-07c6-4961-8a20-60926286bef9;true;Memory, counter-memory and denialism : How search engines circulate information about the Holodomor-related memory wars | |
| temp.internal.duplicates | items/2304b553-14ff-48c9-91fd-552a9334daf1;true;Memory causation | |
| temp.internal.duplicates | items/6c9f6b93-095d-4953-afb0-ff13fc0bd5a6;true;Imagination and memory | |
| temp.internal.duplicates | items/2b57ce1c-2e6b-4b77-b91d-1bbfd9fe66c4;false;Human neural organoid microphysiological systems show the building blocks necessary for basic learning and memory | |
| temp.internal.duplicates | items/a36907ad-80dd-4e13-bf19-73514020a7d6;false;Brain boosters: How bilingualism and working memory enhance children’s comprehension of <i>which</i> -questions | |
| temp.internal.duplicates | items/fde4ea58-3943-4263-a1b2-fbb5ff3db499;false;From prosthetic memory to prosthetic denial: auditing whether large language models are prone to mass atrocity denialism | |
| temp.internal.duplicates | items/26ba05dc-7528-469a-bbc9-d901584932b3;false;Socio-Environmental Crises and Cognitive Ageing. Exploring the Cognitive Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Climate Crises on Older Adults’ Memory and Verbal Fluency |