Searching for Solidarity in the EU Asylum and Border Policies : Constitutional and Operational Dimensions

dc.contributor.authorThym, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorTsourdi, Evangelia
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-13T11:16:02Z
dc.date.available2018-06-13T11:16:02Z
dc.date.issued2017eng
dc.description.abstractSolidarity was once at the core of the European integration process. While originally intended to facilitate further integration, solidarity, in recent years, has often been associated with the intention of safeguarding existing policies. This article attempts to untangle this polysemous concept. It discusses the constitutional significance of solidarity, ultimately distinguishing four discernible dimensions in the EU context: transnational solidarity, inter-state solidarity, solidarity between a particular group of individuals and, finally, the institutional dimension. It unpacks the interaction between solidarity, loyalty and mutual trust, ascertaining them as interlocking principles. We focus on solidarity in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, revealing it to have legal effects which require compensatory action to support the application of supranational rules. Nonetheless, the principle can be realized in different ways, and it is far from certain whether the EU institutions are able to muster the political clout and the political legitimacy necessary to overcome divergences of opinion and perception. Against this backdrop, we sketch what EU institutions have undertaken to operationalize the principle in the ambit of EU asylum and border control policies to respond to the refugee policy crisis. The contributions to this special issue delve more deeply into the different aspects of this central theme.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedeng
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1023263X17741273eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/42568
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.subjectSolidarity and fair-sharing, constitutional principles, loyalty, mutual trust, EU asylum and border policieseng
dc.subject.ddc340eng
dc.titleSearching for Solidarity in the EU Asylum and Border Policies : Constitutional and Operational Dimensionseng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEeng
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Thym2017Searc-42568,
  year={2017},
  doi={10.1177/1023263X17741273},
  title={Searching for Solidarity in the EU Asylum and Border Policies : Constitutional and Operational Dimensions},
  number={5},
  volume={24},
  issn={1023-263X},
  journal={Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law},
  pages={605--621},
  author={Thym, Daniel and Tsourdi, Evangelia}
}
kops.citation.iso690THYM, Daniel, Evangelia TSOURDI, 2017. Searching for Solidarity in the EU Asylum and Border Policies : Constitutional and Operational Dimensions. In: Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. 2017, 24(5), pp. 605-621. ISSN 1023-263X. eISSN 2399-5548. Available under: doi: 10.1177/1023263X17741273deu
kops.citation.iso690THYM, Daniel, Evangelia TSOURDI, 2017. Searching for Solidarity in the EU Asylum and Border Policies : Constitutional and Operational Dimensions. In: Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. 2017, 24(5), pp. 605-621. ISSN 1023-263X. eISSN 2399-5548. Available under: doi: 10.1177/1023263X17741273eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42568">
    <dc:creator>Tsourdi, Evangelia</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-06-13T11:16:02Z</dcterms:available>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/42568"/>
    <dc:creator>Thym, Daniel</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Thym, Daniel</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
    <dcterms:title>Searching for Solidarity in the EU Asylum and Border Policies : Constitutional and Operational Dimensions</dcterms:title>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-06-13T11:16:02Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Solidarity was once at the core of the European integration process. While originally intended to facilitate further integration, solidarity, in recent years, has often been associated with the intention of safeguarding existing policies. This article attempts to untangle this polysemous concept. It discusses the constitutional significance of solidarity, ultimately distinguishing four discernible dimensions in the EU context: transnational solidarity, inter-state solidarity, solidarity between a particular group of individuals and, finally, the institutional dimension. It unpacks the interaction between solidarity, loyalty and mutual trust, ascertaining them as interlocking principles. We focus on solidarity in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, revealing it to have legal effects which require compensatory action to support the application of supranational rules. Nonetheless, the principle can be realized in different ways, and it is far from certain whether the EU institutions are able to muster the political clout and the political legitimacy necessary to overcome divergences of opinion and perception. Against this backdrop, we sketch what EU institutions have undertaken to operationalize the principle in the ambit of EU asylum and border control policies to respond to the refugee policy crisis. The contributions to this special issue delve more deeply into the different aspects of this central theme.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:issued>2017</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:contributor>Tsourdi, Evangelia</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.sourcefieldMaastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. 2017, <b>24</b>(5), pp. 605-621. ISSN 1023-263X. eISSN 2399-5548. Available under: doi: 10.1177/1023263X17741273deu
kops.sourcefield.plainMaastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. 2017, 24(5), pp. 605-621. ISSN 1023-263X. eISSN 2399-5548. Available under: doi: 10.1177/1023263X17741273deu
kops.sourcefield.plainMaastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. 2017, 24(5), pp. 605-621. ISSN 1023-263X. eISSN 2399-5548. Available under: doi: 10.1177/1023263X17741273eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationaaa0724c-68ff-4841-a415-3f2b8e81ae95
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryaaa0724c-68ff-4841-a415-3f2b8e81ae95
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage605eng
source.bibliographicInfo.issue5eng
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage621eng
source.bibliographicInfo.volume24eng
source.identifier.eissn2399-5548eng
source.identifier.issn1023-263Xeng
source.periodicalTitleMaastricht Journal of European and Comparative Laweng

Dateien