Publikation:

The evolutionary position of turtles revised

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Datum

2001

Autor:innen

Zardoya, Rafael

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Naturwissenschaften. 2001, 88(5), pp. 193-200. ISSN 0028-1042. eISSN 1432-1904. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s001140100228

Zusammenfassung

Consensus on the evolutionary position of turtles within the amniote phylogeny has eluded evolutionary biologists for more than a century. This phylogenetic problem has remained unsolved partly because turtles have such a unique morphology that only few characters can be used to link them with any other group of amniotes. Among the many alternative hypotheses that have been postulated to explain the origin and phylogenetic relationships of turtles, a general agreement among paleontologists emerged in favoring the placement of turtles as the only living survivors of the anapsid reptiles (those that lack temporal fenestrae in the skull). However, recent morphological and molecular studies have radically changed our view of amniote phylogenetic relationships, and evidence is accumulating that supports the diapsid affinities of turtles. Molecular studies favor archosaurs (crocodiles and birds) as the living sister group of turtles, whereas morphological studies support lepidosaurs (tuatara, lizards, and snakes) as the closest living relatives of turtles. Accepting these hypotheses implies that turtles cannot be viewed any longer as primitive reptiles, and that they might have lost the temporal holes in the skull secondarily rather than never having had them. Living turtles (order Testudines) are among the most striking and strangest tetrapods. Early on in their evolutionary history, these reptiles evolved distinctive shells as effective defense (Burke 1989). This innovation is probably the key to their evolutionary success and persistence, and has constrained the evolution of the rest of their morphology (Lee 1996). The general Baüplan of turtles has barely changed since the Triassic (200 MYA), yet their carapaces show a great variety of shapes that reflect adaptations to terrestrial, freshwater and marine niches (Pough et al. 1998). Based on the mechanism of retraction of their heads into the shell, extant turtles are classified into two main suborders, Cryptodira (turtles that bend their neck vertically) and Pleurodira (sidenecked turtles) (Shaffer et al. 1997). Cryptodires (approximately 200 species) have a worldwide distribution (though rare in Australia) whereas pleurodires (approximately 50 species) are currently found only in South America, Africa and Australia.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
570 Biowissenschaften, Biologie

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690ZARDOYA, Rafael, Axel MEYER, 2001. The evolutionary position of turtles revised. In: Naturwissenschaften. 2001, 88(5), pp. 193-200. ISSN 0028-1042. eISSN 1432-1904. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s001140100228
BibTex
@article{Zardoya2001evolu-7985,
  year={2001},
  doi={10.1007/s001140100228},
  title={The evolutionary position of turtles revised},
  number={5},
  volume={88},
  issn={0028-1042},
  journal={Naturwissenschaften},
  pages={193--200},
  author={Zardoya, Rafael and Meyer, Axel}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/7985">
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Consensus on the evolutionary position of turtles within the amniote phylogeny has eluded evolutionary biologists for more than a century. This phylogenetic problem has remained unsolved partly because turtles have such a unique morphology that only few characters can be used to link them with any other group of amniotes. Among the many alternative hypotheses that have been postulated to explain the origin and phylogenetic relationships of turtles, a general agreement among paleontologists emerged in favoring the placement of turtles as the only living survivors of the anapsid reptiles (those that lack temporal fenestrae in the skull). However, recent morphological and molecular studies have radically changed our view of amniote phylogenetic relationships, and evidence is accumulating that supports the diapsid affinities of turtles. Molecular studies favor archosaurs (crocodiles and birds) as the living sister group of turtles, whereas morphological studies support lepidosaurs (tuatara, lizards, and snakes) as the closest living relatives of turtles. Accepting these hypotheses implies that turtles cannot be viewed any longer as primitive reptiles, and that they might have lost the temporal holes in the skull secondarily rather than never having had them. Living turtles (order Testudines) are among the most striking and strangest tetrapods. Early on in their evolutionary history, these reptiles evolved distinctive shells as effective defense (Burke 1989). This innovation is probably the key to their evolutionary success and persistence, and has constrained the evolution of the rest of their morphology (Lee 1996). The general Baüplan of turtles has barely changed since the Triassic (200 MYA), yet their carapaces show a great variety of shapes that reflect adaptations to terrestrial, freshwater and marine niches (Pough et al. 1998). Based on the mechanism of retraction of their heads into the shell, extant turtles are classified into two main suborders, Cryptodira (turtles that bend their neck vertically) and Pleurodira (sidenecked turtles) (Shaffer et al. 1997). Cryptodires (approximately 200 species) have a worldwide distribution (though rare in Australia) whereas pleurodires (approximately 50 species) are currently found only in South America, Africa and Australia.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T17:39:03Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:creator>Meyer, Axel</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Zardoya, Rafael</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2001</dcterms:issued>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:contributor>Meyer, Axel</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>The evolutionary position of turtles revised</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Zardoya, Rafael</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
    <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Naturwissenschaften 88 (2001), pp. 193 200</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/7985/1/The_evolutionary_position_of_turtles_revised_2001.pdf"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/7985/1/The_evolutionary_position_of_turtles_revised_2001.pdf"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T17:39:03Z</dc:date>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/7985"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen