No time for powers

dc.contributor.authorBackmann, Marius
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-11T07:11:18Z
dc.date.available2018-05-11T07:11:18Z
dc.date.issued2019-11-26
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, I will investigate the compatibility of different metaphysics of time with the powers view. At first sight, it seems natural to combine some sort of powers ontology with a dynamical view of time, since the dynamic character of powers appears to account for the progression of time. Accordingly, it has been argued that a powers ontology, which is supposed to be inherently dynamic and productive, is incompatible with eternalism, which does not allow for any sort of real productivity. After having reviewed these arguments, I will argue that the powers view is not only incompatible with eternalism but also with the moving spotlight view and growing block theory. I will go on to argue that the specific notion of activity that the powers ontology provides is not straightforwardly compatible with presentism either.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedeng
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/0020174X.2018.1470569eng
dc.identifier.ppn1678715700
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/42295
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectTemporal ontology, powers, eternalism, moving spotlight, growing block view, presentismeng
dc.subject.ddc100eng
dc.titleNo time for powerseng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEeng
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Backmann2019-11-26power-42295,
  year={2019},
  doi={10.1080/0020174X.2018.1470569},
  title={No time for powers},
  number={9-10},
  volume={62},
  issn={0020-174X},
  journal={Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy},
  pages={979--1007},
  author={Backmann, Marius}
}
kops.citation.iso690BACKMANN, Marius, 2019. No time for powers. In: Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy. 2019, 62(9-10), pp. 979-1007. ISSN 0020-174X. eISSN 1502-3923. Available under: doi: 10.1080/0020174X.2018.1470569deu
kops.citation.iso690BACKMANN, Marius, 2019. No time for powers. In: Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy. 2019, 62(9-10), pp. 979-1007. ISSN 0020-174X. eISSN 1502-3923. Available under: doi: 10.1080/0020174X.2018.1470569eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42295">
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/42295/3/Backmann_2-1ahw8l52lsfho1.pdf"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Backmann, Marius</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dc:creator>Backmann, Marius</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2019-11-26</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:title>No time for powers</dcterms:title>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/42295"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In this paper, I will investigate the compatibility of different metaphysics of time with the powers view. At first sight, it seems natural to combine some sort of powers ontology with a dynamical view of time, since the dynamic character of powers appears to account for the progression of time. Accordingly, it has been argued that a powers ontology, which is supposed to be inherently dynamic and productive, is incompatible with eternalism, which does not allow for any sort of real productivity. After having reviewed these arguments, I will argue that the powers view is not only incompatible with eternalism but also with the moving spotlight view and growing block theory. I will go on to argue that the specific notion of activity that the powers ontology provides is not straightforwardly compatible with presentism either.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-05-11T07:11:18Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/42295/3/Backmann_2-1ahw8l52lsfho1.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-05-11T07:11:18Z</dcterms:available>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.openAccessopenaccesshybrid
kops.flag.isPeerReviewedtrue
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-1ahw8l52lsfho1
kops.sourcefieldInquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy. 2019, <b>62</b>(9-10), pp. 979-1007. ISSN 0020-174X. eISSN 1502-3923. Available under: doi: 10.1080/0020174X.2018.1470569deu
kops.sourcefield.plainInquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy. 2019, 62(9-10), pp. 979-1007. ISSN 0020-174X. eISSN 1502-3923. Available under: doi: 10.1080/0020174X.2018.1470569deu
kops.sourcefield.plainInquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy. 2019, 62(9-10), pp. 979-1007. ISSN 0020-174X. eISSN 1502-3923. Available under: doi: 10.1080/0020174X.2018.1470569eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication85685dbc-10db-417c-bd4a-642a71fe97e8
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery85685dbc-10db-417c-bd4a-642a71fe97e8
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage979
source.bibliographicInfo.issue9-10
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage1007
source.bibliographicInfo.volume62
source.identifier.eissn1502-3923eng
source.identifier.issn0020-174Xeng
source.periodicalTitleInquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophyeng

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Backmann_2-1ahw8l52lsfho1.pdf
Größe:
1.9 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Beschreibung:
Backmann_2-1ahw8l52lsfho1.pdf
Backmann_2-1ahw8l52lsfho1.pdfGröße: 1.9 MBDownloads: 437

Lizenzbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
license.txt
Größe:
3.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Beschreibung:
license.txt
license.txtGröße: 3.88 KBDownloads: 0