Publikation:

Epistemic Dilemma and Epistemic Conflict

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2022

Autor:innen

Wagner, Verena

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Sammelband
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

MCCAIN, Kevin, ed., Scott STAPLEFORD, ed., Matthias STEUP, ed.. Epistemic Dilemmas : New Arguments, New Angles. New York: Routledge, 2022, pp. 58-76. ISBN 978-1-00-313456-5. Available under: doi: 10.4324/9781003134565-6

Zusammenfassung

In this chapter, I will examine the notion of an epistemic dilemma and the different intuitions prompted by it. I will illustrate that this notion is expected to capture various aspects that are not easily unified: while some aspects are more about the agent in a certain situation, other aspects seem to be more about the situation as such. As a consequence, incompatible intuitions emerge about the transparency of epistemic dilemmas and about the role doxastic suspension may play in resolving dilemmic cases. I suggest a distinction between the mental state of agents who find themselves in an epistemic dilemma and the normative situation that gives rise to a dilemma. I will refer to the agent’s mental state as “epistemic conflict” and will reserve the term “epistemic dilemma” for evidential situations in which epistemic principles either recommend incompatible doxastic responses or render all options impermissible. The concept of epistemic conflict also applies to agents who face difficult epistemic choices that they cannot resolve without substantial mental effort, for example, via doxastic suspension.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690WAGNER, Verena, 2022. Epistemic Dilemma and Epistemic Conflict. In: MCCAIN, Kevin, ed., Scott STAPLEFORD, ed., Matthias STEUP, ed.. Epistemic Dilemmas : New Arguments, New Angles. New York: Routledge, 2022, pp. 58-76. ISBN 978-1-00-313456-5. Available under: doi: 10.4324/9781003134565-6
BibTex
@incollection{Wagner2022Epist-56500,
  year={2022},
  doi={10.4324/9781003134565-6},
  title={Epistemic Dilemma and Epistemic Conflict},
  isbn={978-1-00-313456-5},
  publisher={Routledge},
  address={New York},
  booktitle={Epistemic Dilemmas : New Arguments, New Angles},
  pages={58--76},
  editor={McCain, Kevin and Stapleford, Scott and Steup, Matthias},
  author={Wagner, Verena}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/56500">
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-02-10T11:50:37Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Wagner, Verena</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>Epistemic Dilemma and Epistemic Conflict</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:issued>2022</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-02-10T11:50:37Z</dcterms:available>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/56500"/>
    <dc:contributor>Wagner, Verena</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In this chapter, I will examine the notion of an epistemic dilemma and the different intuitions prompted by it. I will illustrate that this notion is expected to capture various aspects that are not easily unified: while some aspects are more about the agent in a certain situation, other aspects seem to be more about the situation as such. As a consequence, incompatible intuitions emerge about the transparency of epistemic dilemmas and about the role doxastic suspension may play in resolving dilemmic cases. I suggest a distinction between the mental state of agents who find themselves in an epistemic dilemma and the normative situation that gives rise to a dilemma. I will refer to the agent’s mental state as “epistemic conflict” and will reserve the term “epistemic dilemma” for evidential situations in which epistemic principles either recommend incompatible doxastic responses or render all options impermissible. The concept of epistemic conflict also applies to agents who face difficult epistemic choices that they cannot resolve without substantial mental effort, for example, via doxastic suspension.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen