Examining public support for Ukraine’s defense against autocratic aggression

dc.contributor.authorRudolph, Lukas
dc.contributor.authorHaggerty, Fabian
dc.contributor.authorThurner, Paul W.
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-13T15:21:47Z
dc.date.available2026-01-13T15:21:47Z
dc.date.issued2026-01-09
dc.description.abstractRussia’s invasion of Ukraine challenges the liberal international order and tests the capacity of Western democracies to maintain long-term military and financial aid for Ukraine in a foreign war. Understanding whether governments’ pledges of resolve are backed by their citizens is crucial for the credibility of these commitments. Here we show, based on survey experiments with 10,011 respondents in the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, and Italy, that these countries’ publics share a similar pattern of preferences. In all countries, citizens strongly endorse Ukraine’s sovereignty and self-determination while weighing human suffering and conflict escalation risk, but less so economic costs. However, within countries, attitudes are polarized: roughly one quarter of citizens with pro-Western orientations show firm resolve, whereas another quarter with anti-Western views remain largely indifferent to political outcomes for Ukraine. These divisions indicate that democratic party competition could constrain the unity and durability of Western resolve against autocratic aggression.
dc.description.versionpublisheddeu
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41467-025-67913-z
dc.identifier.ppn1950431703
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/75673
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc320
dc.titleExamining public support for Ukraine’s defense against autocratic aggressioneng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLE
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Rudolph2026-01-09Exami-75673,
  title={Examining public support for Ukraine’s defense against autocratic aggression},
  year={2026},
  doi={10.1038/s41467-025-67913-z},
  number={1},
  volume={17},
  journal={Nature Communications},
  author={Rudolph, Lukas and Haggerty, Fabian and Thurner, Paul W.},
  note={PDF zur weiteren Bearbeitung im Hiwi-Ordner, OA-artikel, 13.1.26 sw Article Number: 414}
}
kops.citation.iso690RUDOLPH, Lukas, Fabian HAGGERTY, Paul W. THURNER, 2026. Examining public support for Ukraine’s defense against autocratic aggression. In: Nature Communications. Springer. 2026, 17(1), 414. eISSN 2041-1723. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-67913-zdeu
kops.citation.iso690RUDOLPH, Lukas, Fabian HAGGERTY, Paul W. THURNER, 2026. Examining public support for Ukraine’s defense against autocratic aggression. In: Nature Communications. Springer. 2026, 17(1), 414. eISSN 2041-1723. Available under: doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-67913-zeng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/75673">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Thurner, Paul W.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Haggerty, Fabian</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2026-01-13T15:21:47Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:creator>Thurner, Paul W.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Rudolph, Lukas</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2026-01-09</dcterms:issued>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/75673"/>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:title>Examining public support for Ukraine’s defense against autocratic aggression</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/75673/1/Rudolph_2-19ytoaxfoe1mh2.pdf"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/75673/1/Rudolph_2-19ytoaxfoe1mh2.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Haggerty, Fabian</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Rudolph, Lukas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2026-01-13T15:21:47Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract>Russia’s invasion of Ukraine challenges the liberal international order and tests the capacity of Western democracies to maintain long-term military and financial aid for Ukraine in a foreign war. Understanding whether governments’ pledges of resolve are backed by their citizens is crucial for the credibility of these commitments. Here we show, based on survey experiments with 10,011 respondents in the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, and Italy, that these countries’ publics share a similar pattern of preferences. In all countries, citizens strongly endorse Ukraine’s sovereignty and self-determination while weighing human suffering and conflict escalation risk, but less so economic costs. However, within countries, attitudes are polarized: roughly one quarter of citizens with pro-Western orientations show firm resolve, whereas another quarter with anti-Western views remain largely indifferent to political outcomes for Ukraine. These divisions indicate that democratic party competition could constrain the unity and durability of Western resolve against autocratic aggression.</dcterms:abstract>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.commentPDF zur weiteren Bearbeitung im Hiwi-Ordner, OA-artikel, 13.1.26 sw
kops.description.openAccessopenaccessgold
kops.flag.isPeerReviewedtrue
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-19ytoaxfoe1mh2
kops.sourcefieldNature Communications. Springer. 2026, <b>17</b>(1), 414. eISSN 2041-1723. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-67913-zdeu
kops.sourcefield.plainNature Communications. Springer. 2026, 17(1), 414. eISSN 2041-1723. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-67913-zdeu
kops.sourcefield.plainNature Communications. Springer. 2026, 17(1), 414. eISSN 2041-1723. Available under: doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-67913-zeng
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb81850ca-2661-4f65-ac3a-98ce15d296b9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryb81850ca-2661-4f65-ac3a-98ce15d296b9
relation.isDatasetOfPublication47b7f9c1-c2b8-42de-9e1d-6bb4cdf75107
relation.isDatasetOfPublication.latestForDiscovery47b7f9c1-c2b8-42de-9e1d-6bb4cdf75107
source.bibliographicInfo.articleNumber414
source.bibliographicInfo.issue1
source.bibliographicInfo.volume17
source.identifier.eissn2041-1723
source.periodicalTitleNature Communications
source.publisherSpringer
temp.internal.duplicatesitems/47b7f9c1-c2b8-42de-9e1d-6bb4cdf75107;false;Replication Data for: Examining public support for Ukraine’s defense against autocratic aggression

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Rudolph_2-19ytoaxfoe1mh2.pdf
Größe:
1.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Rudolph_2-19ytoaxfoe1mh2.pdf
Rudolph_2-19ytoaxfoe1mh2.pdfGröße: 1.22 MBDownloads: 18