Blame and praise : responsibility attribution patterns in decision chains
Dateien
Datum
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
How do people attribute responsibility when an outcome is not caused by an individual but results from a decision chain involving several people? We study this question in an experiment, in which five voters sequentially decide on how to distribute money between them and five recipients. The recipients can reward or punish each voter, which we use as measures of responsibility attribution. In the aggregate, we find that responsibility is attributed mostly according to the voters’ choices and the pivotality of the decision, but not for being the initial voter. On the individual level, we find substantial heterogeneity with three overall patterns: Little to no responsibility attribution, pivotality-driven, and focus on choices. These patterns are similar when praising voters for good outcomes and blaming voters for bad outcomes.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
BHATIA, Deepti, Urs FISCHBACHER, Jan HAUSFELD, Regina STUMPF, 2024. Blame and praise : responsibility attribution patterns in decision chains. In: Experimental Economics. Springer. 2024, 27(3), S. 637-663. ISSN 1386-4157. eISSN 1573-6938. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1007/s10683-024-09833-1BibTex
@article{Bhatia2024-07Blame-70361, year={2024}, doi={10.1007/s10683-024-09833-1}, title={Blame and praise : responsibility attribution patterns in decision chains}, number={3}, volume={27}, issn={1386-4157}, journal={Experimental Economics}, pages={637--663}, author={Bhatia, Deepti and Fischbacher, Urs and Hausfeld, Jan and Stumpf, Regina} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/70361"> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:creator>Hausfeld, Jan</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Bhatia, Deepti</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/70361"/> <dc:contributor>Bhatia, Deepti</dc:contributor> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2024-07-09T09:37:29Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Fischbacher, Urs</dc:contributor> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2024-07-09T09:37:29Z</dcterms:available> <dc:contributor>Stumpf, Regina</dc:contributor> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/> <dc:creator>Fischbacher, Urs</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Hausfeld, Jan</dc:contributor> <dcterms:title>Blame and praise : responsibility attribution patterns in decision chains</dcterms:title> <dc:creator>Stumpf, Regina</dc:creator> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:issued>2024-07</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:abstract>How do people attribute responsibility when an outcome is not caused by an individual but results from a decision chain involving several people? We study this question in an experiment, in which five voters sequentially decide on how to distribute money between them and five recipients. The recipients can reward or punish each voter, which we use as measures of responsibility attribution. In the aggregate, we find that responsibility is attributed mostly according to the voters’ choices and the pivotality of the decision, but not for being the initial voter. On the individual level, we find substantial heterogeneity with three overall patterns: Little to no responsibility attribution, pivotality-driven, and focus on choices. These patterns are similar when praising voters for good outcomes and blaming voters for bad outcomes.</dcterms:abstract> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>