Evidentielle Einzigkeit in klassischer und formaler Erkenntnistheorie

dc.contributor.authorBriesen, Jochen
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T10:49:50Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T10:49:50Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-15deu
dc.description.versionpublisheddeu
dc.identifier.doi10.3196/004433017821280476deu
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/48378
dc.language.isodeudeu
dc.subject.ddc100deu
dc.titleEvidentielle Einzigkeit in klassischer und formaler Erkenntnistheoriedeu
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEdeu
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Briesen2017-06-15Evide-48378,
  year={2017},
  doi={10.3196/004433017821280476},
  title={Evidentielle Einzigkeit in klassischer und formaler Erkenntnistheorie},
  number={2},
  volume={71},
  issn={0044-3301},
  journal={Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung},
  pages={183--222},
  author={Briesen, Jochen}
}
kops.citation.iso690BRIESEN, Jochen, 2017. Evidentielle Einzigkeit in klassischer und formaler Erkenntnistheorie. In: Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung. Klostermann. 2017, 71(2), pp. 183-222. ISSN 0044-3301. eISSN 1439-2615. Available under: doi: 10.3196/004433017821280476deu
kops.citation.iso690BRIESEN, Jochen, 2017. Evidentielle Einzigkeit in klassischer und formaler Erkenntnistheorie. In: Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung. Klostermann. 2017, 71(2), pp. 183-222. ISSN 0044-3301. eISSN 1439-2615. Available under: doi: 10.3196/004433017821280476eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/48378">
    <dc:contributor>Briesen, Jochen</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2017-06-15</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-01-27T10:49:50Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-01-27T10:49:50Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:title>Evidentielle Einzigkeit in klassischer und formaler Erkenntnistheorie</dcterms:title>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/48378"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dc:creator>Briesen, Jochen</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:language>deu</dc:language>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.abstractThe evidential uniqueness thesis claims roughly that, in the light of a certain body of evidence E, at most one doxastic attitude – belief, disbelief, or suspension of belief – toward any particular proposition may be rationally adopted by subjects. This paper discusses the relevance of the thesis in both classical (non-formal) as well as formal epistemological research traditions. It goes on to investigate the plausibility of the thesis and the considerations on which its initial attractiveness rests. It is argued that all the considerations in favor of the thesis that can be found in the literature are unconvincing. However, a thus far overlooked argument is presented that is able to motivate the thesis – at least to a certain extent.deu
kops.flag.isPeerReviewedtruedeu
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.sourcefieldZeitschrift für philosophische Forschung. Klostermann. 2017, <b>71</b>(2), pp. 183-222. ISSN 0044-3301. eISSN 1439-2615. Available under: doi: 10.3196/004433017821280476deu
kops.sourcefield.plainZeitschrift für philosophische Forschung. Klostermann. 2017, 71(2), pp. 183-222. ISSN 0044-3301. eISSN 1439-2615. Available under: doi: 10.3196/004433017821280476deu
kops.sourcefield.plainZeitschrift für philosophische Forschung. Klostermann. 2017, 71(2), pp. 183-222. ISSN 0044-3301. eISSN 1439-2615. Available under: doi: 10.3196/004433017821280476eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5b206d15-20e5-4d39-bf2e-ecb419a264b7
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5b206d15-20e5-4d39-bf2e-ecb419a264b7
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage183deu
source.bibliographicInfo.issue2deu
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage222deu
source.bibliographicInfo.volume71deu
source.identifier.eissn1439-2615deu
source.identifier.issn0044-3301deu
source.periodicalTitleZeitschrift für philosophische Forschungdeu
source.publisherKlostermanndeu

Dateien