Publikation: Inherent focus on wh-phrases
Lade...
Dateien
Datum
2007
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Konferenzband
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
PUIG-WALDMÜLLER, Estela, ed.. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11. Barcelona: Universität Pompeu Fabra, 2007, pp. 209-228
Zusammenfassung
In the first part of the paper, I propose a framework for focus and question interpretation. While both serve to introcude alternatives, I offer reasons that the two kinds of alternatives arise on different levels of semantic interpretation. The resulting approach can correctly account for all possible constellations of focus and questions, including intervention effects, without the use of type shifts In the second part of the paper, I will investigate data which suggest that the presence/absence of focus features correlate with a question/indefinite interpretation of wh-words. I propose that the semantic closeness is motivated diachronically. Importantly, type shifts between question alternatives and properties are possible steps in diachrony, but not part of the productive part of semantic interpretation.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
400 Sprachwissenschaft, Linguistik
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Sinn und Bedeutung 11, 21. Sept. 2006 - 23. Sept. 2006, Barcelona
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
ECKARDT, Regine, 2007. Inherent focus on wh-phrases. Sinn und Bedeutung 11. Barcelona, 21. Sept. 2006 - 23. Sept. 2006. In: PUIG-WALDMÜLLER, Estela, ed.. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11. Barcelona: Universität Pompeu Fabra, 2007, pp. 209-228BibTex
@inproceedings{Eckardt2007Inher-37602,
year={2007},
title={Inherent focus on wh-phrases},
url={http://parles.upf.edu/llocs/glif/pub/sub11/individual/eckardt.pdf},
publisher={Universität Pompeu Fabra},
address={Barcelona},
booktitle={Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11},
pages={209--228},
editor={Puig-Waldmüller, Estela},
author={Eckardt, Regine}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/37602">
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/37602"/>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:title>Inherent focus on wh-phrases</dcterms:title>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-02-20T15:00:50Z</dcterms:available>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-02-20T15:00:50Z</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Eckardt, Regine</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Eckardt, Regine</dc:contributor>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/37602/3/Eckardt_0-390467.pdf"/>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In the first part of the paper, I propose a framework for focus and question interpretation. While both serve to introcude alternatives, I offer reasons that the two kinds of alternatives arise on different levels of semantic interpretation. The resulting approach can correctly account for all possible constellations of focus and questions, including intervention effects, without the use of type shifts In the second part of the paper, I will investigate data which suggest that the presence/absence of focus features correlate with a question/indefinite interpretation of wh-words. I propose that the semantic closeness is motivated diachronically. Importantly, type shifts between question alternatives and properties are possible steps in diachrony, but not part of the productive part of semantic interpretation.</dcterms:abstract>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dcterms:issued>2007</dcterms:issued>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/37602/3/Eckardt_0-390467.pdf"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
2017-02-20
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
