Publikation: Homology evolving
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
The defining criterion for homology has been common ancestry ever since darwinian evolution replaced fidelity to archetype as the explanation for similarity among traits of organisms. Although, in some cases, an alternative criterion of similarity in developmental control or other underlying traits can be helpful in diagnosing homology, evidence for dissociation among traits at different levels of organization (e.g. genotype and phenotype) and for frequency of reticulate (lateral) evolution accentuate the problems inherent in using similarity as the defining criterion. Growing awareness that character history and organismal lineage history can and do differ puts homology definition and assessment center stage in our understanding of the evolution of genomes.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
MINDELL, David P., Axel MEYER, 2001. Homology evolving. In: Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2001, 16(8), pp. 434-440. ISSN 0169-5347. Available under: doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02206-6BibTex
@article{Mindell2001Homol-6642, year={2001}, doi={10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02206-6}, title={Homology evolving}, number={8}, volume={16}, issn={0169-5347}, journal={Trends in Ecology and Evolution}, pages={434--440}, author={Mindell, David P. and Meyer, Axel} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/6642"> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16 (2001), 8, pp. 434-440</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dc:creator>Meyer, Axel</dc:creator> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:contributor>Mindell, David P.</dc:contributor> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:title>Homology evolving</dcterms:title> <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format> <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic</dc:rights> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/6642/1/Homology_evolving.pdf"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:contributor>Meyer, Axel</dc:contributor> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/6642/1/Homology_evolving.pdf"/> <dcterms:issued>2001</dcterms:issued> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T17:28:00Z</dc:date> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T17:28:00Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The defining criterion for homology has been common ancestry ever since darwinian evolution replaced fidelity to archetype as the explanation for similarity among traits of organisms. Although, in some cases, an alternative criterion of similarity in developmental control or other underlying traits can be helpful in diagnosing homology, evidence for dissociation among traits at different levels of organization (e.g. genotype and phenotype) and for frequency of reticulate (lateral) evolution accentuate the problems inherent in using similarity as the defining criterion. Growing awareness that character history and organismal lineage history can and do differ puts homology definition and assessment center stage in our understanding of the evolution of genomes.</dcterms:abstract> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/6642"/> <dc:creator>Mindell, David P.</dc:creator> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>