Web-based versus Lab-based Studies : a Response to Kendall (2008)

dc.contributor.authorHoning, Henkjandeu
dc.contributor.authorReips, Ulf-Dietrich
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-13T15:36:26Zdeu
dc.date.available2014-08-13T15:36:26Zdeu
dc.date.issued2008deu
dc.description.abstractWhile in an earlier commentary (Honing & Ladinig, 2008) we stressed the potential of Web-delivered experiments for music perception research, the ongoing discussion on Web-based versus lab-based studies seems to circle around issues of method and control (Mehler, 1999; Kendall, 2008). We agree with the importance of these issues from a methodological point of view. However, we continue to stress that these issues are not essentially different for Web-based as compared to lab-based studies.eng
dc.description.versionpublished
dc.identifier.citationEmpirical Musicology Review ; 3 (2008), 2. - S. 73-77deu
dc.identifier.doi10.5167/uzh-4560
dc.identifier.ppn179655684X
dc.identifier.urihttp://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/28681
dc.language.isoengdeu
dc.legacy.dateIssued2014-08-13deu
dc.rightsterms-of-usedeu
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/deu
dc.subjectInternet-based experimenting, empirical, experimental method
dc.subject.ddc150deu
dc.titleWeb-based versus Lab-based Studies : a Response to Kendall (2008)eng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEdeu
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Honing2008Webba-28681,
  year={2008},
  doi={10.5167/uzh-4560},
  title={Web-based versus Lab-based Studies : a Response to Kendall (2008)},
  number={2},
  volume={3},
  journal={Empirical Musicology Review},
  pages={73--77},
  author={Honing, Henkjan and Reips, Ulf-Dietrich}
}
kops.citation.iso690HONING, Henkjan, Ulf-Dietrich REIPS, 2008. Web-based versus Lab-based Studies : a Response to Kendall (2008). In: Empirical Musicology Review. 2008, 3(2), pp. 73-77. eISSN 1559-5749. Available under: doi: 10.5167/uzh-4560deu
kops.citation.iso690HONING, Henkjan, Ulf-Dietrich REIPS, 2008. Web-based versus Lab-based Studies : a Response to Kendall (2008). In: Empirical Musicology Review. 2008, 3(2), pp. 73-77. eISSN 1559-5749. Available under: doi: 10.5167/uzh-4560eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28681">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Empirical Musicology Review ; 3 (2008), 2. - S. 73-77</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">While in an earlier commentary (Honing &amp; Ladinig, 2008) we stressed the potential of Web-delivered experiments for music perception research, the ongoing discussion on Web-based versus lab-based studies seems to circle around issues of method and control (Mehler, 1999; Kendall, 2008). We agree with the importance of these issues from a methodological point of view. However, we continue to stress that these issues are not essentially different for Web-based as compared to lab-based studies.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Reips, Ulf-Dietrich</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/28681/2/Honing_286810.pdf"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-08-13T15:36:26Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Honing, Henkjan</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2008</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Reips, Ulf-Dietrich</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>Web-based versus Lab-based Studies : a Response to Kendall (2008)</dcterms:title>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-08-13T15:36:26Z</dcterms:available>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/28681"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/28681/2/Honing_286810.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Honing, Henkjan</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.openAccessopenaccessgold
kops.flag.knbibliographyfalse
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-286810deu
kops.sourcefieldEmpirical Musicology Review. 2008, <b>3</b>(2), pp. 73-77. eISSN 1559-5749. Available under: doi: 10.5167/uzh-4560deu
kops.sourcefield.plainEmpirical Musicology Review. 2008, 3(2), pp. 73-77. eISSN 1559-5749. Available under: doi: 10.5167/uzh-4560deu
kops.sourcefield.plainEmpirical Musicology Review. 2008, 3(2), pp. 73-77. eISSN 1559-5749. Available under: doi: 10.5167/uzh-4560eng
kops.submitter.emailchristoph.petzmann@uni-konstanz.dedeu
relation.isAuthorOfPublication10de7423-bec5-4bea-99c1-dff3e543da0b
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery10de7423-bec5-4bea-99c1-dff3e543da0b
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage73
source.bibliographicInfo.issue2
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage77
source.bibliographicInfo.volume3
source.identifier.eissn1559-5749deu
source.periodicalTitleEmpirical Musicology Review

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Honing_286810.pdf
Größe:
55.48 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Beschreibung:
Honing_286810.pdf
Honing_286810.pdfGröße: 55.48 KBDownloads: 94

Lizenzbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
license.txt
Größe:
1.92 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Beschreibung:
license.txt
license.txtGröße: 1.92 KBDownloads: 0

Versionsgeschichte

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
VersionDatumZusammenfassung
1*
2014-08-13 15:36:26
* Ausgewählte Version