Reduced plant water use can explain higher soil moisture in organic compared to conventional farming systems

dc.contributor.authorSchärer, Marie-Louise
dc.contributor.authorDietrich, Lars
dc.contributor.authorKundel, Dominika
dc.contributor.authorMäder, Paul
dc.contributor.authorKahmen, Ansgar
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-20T09:36:41Z
dc.date.available2022-05-20T09:36:41Z
dc.date.issued2022eng
dc.description.abstractConventional high-input farming systems in Europe are often regarded as unsustainable with severe environmental impacts on biodiversity, soils, water and climate. Low-input farming approaches, such as organic farming, have been proposed to reduce environmental impacts while further improving soil properties such as soil organic matter content and aggregate stability. Whether these changes also influence ecohydrological properties and improve the water relations of organically grown crops remains unclear. In this study we assessed the long-term effects of conventional and organic farming systems on the water relations of soils and crops in the “DOK” (bio-Dynamic, bio-Organic & ‘Konventionell’ = conventional) trial. In particular, we tested if organic and conventional farming lead to marked differences in soil moisture, soil water evaporation, as well as root water uptake depth and stomatal conductance of winter wheat and soybean during the growing seasons 2017 and 2018. Stable isotope analyses and ecophysiological measurements revealed that organic compared to conventional farming did not affect soil water evaporation or root water uptake depths. Instead, we found higher soil moisture in the rooting zone and reduced stomatal conductance (gs) in organically grown wheat. Treatment effects on soil moisture and gs of soybean were smaller but showed similar tendencies as observed in wheat. Also, leaf area, and grain and straw yield of wheat decreased under organic farming while yields of soybean were not affected by the treatments. Based on our data we suggest that reduced plant water use observed under organically managed farming lead to the observed higher soil moisture in organically compared to conventionally managed farming systems in the DOK trial. These results suggest advantages of organic farming regarding agronomic water use as well as for the resistance of farming systems to current or future drought scenarios.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedde
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.agee.2022.107915eng
dc.identifier.ppn1808567897
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/57598
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectOrganic farming, DOK trial, Soil moisture, Stomatal conductance, Soil water evaporation, Root water uptake depth, Water useeng
dc.subject.ddc570eng
dc.titleReduced plant water use can explain higher soil moisture in organic compared to conventional farming systemseng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEde
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Scharer2022Reduc-57598,
  year={2022},
  doi={10.1016/j.agee.2022.107915},
  title={Reduced plant water use can explain higher soil moisture in organic compared to conventional farming systems},
  volume={332},
  issn={0167-8809},
  journal={Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment},
  author={Schärer, Marie-Louise and Dietrich, Lars and Kundel, Dominika and Mäder, Paul and Kahmen, Ansgar},
  note={Article Number: 107915}
}
kops.citation.iso690SCHÄRER, Marie-Louise, Lars DIETRICH, Dominika KUNDEL, Paul MÄDER, Ansgar KAHMEN, 2022. Reduced plant water use can explain higher soil moisture in organic compared to conventional farming systems. In: Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. Elsevier. 2022, 332, 107915. ISSN 0167-8809. eISSN 1873-2305. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2022.107915deu
kops.citation.iso690SCHÄRER, Marie-Louise, Lars DIETRICH, Dominika KUNDEL, Paul MÄDER, Ansgar KAHMEN, 2022. Reduced plant water use can explain higher soil moisture in organic compared to conventional farming systems. In: Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. Elsevier. 2022, 332, 107915. ISSN 0167-8809. eISSN 1873-2305. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2022.107915eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/57598">
    <dcterms:issued>2022</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>Dietrich, Lars</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Mäder, Paul</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-05-20T09:36:41Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Mäder, Paul</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/57598/1/Schaerer_2-uxpulvd5ap396.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Kundel, Dominika</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/57598/1/Schaerer_2-uxpulvd5ap396.pdf"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-05-20T09:36:41Z</dc:date>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/57598"/>
    <dc:creator>Schärer, Marie-Louise</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:creator>Kahmen, Ansgar</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Schärer, Marie-Louise</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Kahmen, Ansgar</dc:contributor>
    <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:contributor>Dietrich, Lars</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Kundel, Dominika</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>Reduced plant water use can explain higher soil moisture in organic compared to conventional farming systems</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Conventional high-input farming systems in Europe are often regarded as unsustainable with severe environmental impacts on biodiversity, soils, water and climate. Low-input farming approaches, such as organic farming, have been proposed to reduce environmental impacts while further improving soil properties such as soil organic matter content and aggregate stability. Whether these changes also influence ecohydrological properties and improve the water relations of organically grown crops remains unclear. In this study we assessed the long-term effects of conventional and organic farming systems on the water relations of soils and crops in the “DOK” (bio-Dynamic, bio-Organic &amp; ‘Konventionell’ = conventional) trial. In particular, we tested if organic and conventional farming lead to marked differences in soil moisture, soil water evaporation, as well as root water uptake depth and stomatal conductance of winter wheat and soybean during the growing seasons 2017 and 2018. Stable isotope analyses and ecophysiological measurements revealed that organic compared to conventional farming did not affect soil water evaporation or root water uptake depths. Instead, we found higher soil moisture in the rooting zone and reduced stomatal conductance (gs) in organically grown wheat. Treatment effects on soil moisture and gs of soybean were smaller but showed similar tendencies as observed in wheat. Also, leaf area, and grain and straw yield of wheat decreased under organic farming while yields of soybean were not affected by the treatments. Based on our data we suggest that reduced plant water use observed under organically managed farming lead to the observed higher soil moisture in organically compared to conventionally managed farming systems in the DOK trial. These results suggest advantages of organic farming regarding agronomic water use as well as for the resistance of farming systems to current or future drought scenarios.</dcterms:abstract>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.openAccessopenaccesshybrideng
kops.flag.isPeerReviewedtrueeng
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-uxpulvd5ap396
kops.sourcefieldAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. Elsevier. 2022, <b>332</b>, 107915. ISSN 0167-8809. eISSN 1873-2305. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2022.107915deu
kops.sourcefield.plainAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. Elsevier. 2022, 332, 107915. ISSN 0167-8809. eISSN 1873-2305. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2022.107915deu
kops.sourcefield.plainAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. Elsevier. 2022, 332, 107915. ISSN 0167-8809. eISSN 1873-2305. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2022.107915eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7d4d26d9-8177-4ba9-acfa-a3539a0d5aa8
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery7d4d26d9-8177-4ba9-acfa-a3539a0d5aa8
source.bibliographicInfo.articleNumber107915eng
source.bibliographicInfo.volume332eng
source.identifier.eissn1873-2305eng
source.identifier.issn0167-8809eng
source.periodicalTitleAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environmenteng
source.publisherElsevier

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Schaerer_2-uxpulvd5ap396.pdf
Größe:
1.68 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Beschreibung:
Schaerer_2-uxpulvd5ap396.pdf
Schaerer_2-uxpulvd5ap396.pdfGröße: 1.68 MBDownloads: 98