The Principal–Agent Model, Accountability and Democratic Legitimacy

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2017
Autor:innen
Adriaensen, Johan
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
EU-Projektnummer
DFG-Projektnummer
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Sammelband
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
DELREUX, Tom, ed., Johan ADRIAENSEN, ed.. The Principal Agent Model and the European Union. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, pp. 35-54. ISBN 978-3-319-55136-4. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-55137-1_2
Zusammenfassung

This chapter explores the normative underpinnings of the principal–agent model. These are situated in Rousseau’s analysis of the representative democracy and Weber’s study of the bureaucracy. Whereas many of their arguments still maintain their value in present-day politics, the empirical reality in which these ideas developed has changed drastically. The rise of alternative forms of public contestation, and above all, the multi-level decision-making setting of the EU, begs the question for which contemporary debates the principal–agent model still holds moral sway. We argue that—while principal–agent analyses can benefit from an explicit normative debate—the model is too reductionist to provide conclusive answers to such debates.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690BRANDSMA, Gijs Jan, Johan ADRIAENSEN, 2017. The Principal–Agent Model, Accountability and Democratic Legitimacy. In: DELREUX, Tom, ed., Johan ADRIAENSEN, ed.. The Principal Agent Model and the European Union. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, pp. 35-54. ISBN 978-3-319-55136-4. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-55137-1_2
BibTex
@incollection{Brandsma2017-10-18Princ-41818,
  year={2017},
  doi={10.1007/978-3-319-55137-1_2},
  title={The Principal–Agent Model, Accountability and Democratic Legitimacy},
  isbn={978-3-319-55136-4},
  publisher={Palgrave Macmillan},
  address={Cham},
  booktitle={The Principal Agent Model and the European Union},
  pages={35--54},
  editor={Delreux, Tom and Adriaensen, Johan},
  author={Brandsma, Gijs Jan and Adriaensen, Johan}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/41818">
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-03-19T12:32:16Z</dc:date>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Adriaensen, Johan</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Adriaensen, Johan</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>The Principal–Agent Model, Accountability and Democratic Legitimacy</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Brandsma, Gijs Jan</dc:creator>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/41818"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-03-19T12:32:16Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:contributor>Brandsma, Gijs Jan</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This chapter explores the normative underpinnings of the principal–agent model. These are situated in Rousseau’s analysis of the representative democracy and Weber’s study of the bureaucracy. Whereas many of their arguments still maintain their value in present-day politics, the empirical reality in which these ideas developed has changed drastically. The rise of alternative forms of public contestation, and above all, the multi-level decision-making setting of the EU, begs the question for which contemporary debates the principal–agent model still holds moral sway. We argue that—while principal–agent analyses can benefit from an explicit normative debate—the model is too reductionist to provide conclusive answers to such debates.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:issued>2017-10-18</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Begutachtet