Publikation: To Yield or Shield? : Comparing International Public Administrations' Responses to Member States' Policy Contestation
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
When member states contest policymaking in international organizations, some international public administrations (IPAs) react in a conciliatory way while others are adversarial. This article argues that IPAs’ dependence on contesting states, their policymaking authority, and affectedness from contestation shape communicative responses. A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of 32 cases of contestation by the Trump administration indicates that IPAs yield when they are constrained by dependence on the United States or have no incentive to defend themselves. IPAs fend off contestation when they are unconstrained and incentivized by attacks on an international organizations’s polity, the bureaucracy, or policies in whose making they were substantially involved.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
HEINKELMANN-WILD, Tim, Vytautas JANKAUSKAS, 2022. To Yield or Shield? : Comparing International Public Administrations' Responses to Member States' Policy Contestation. In: Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 2022, 24(3), pp. 296-312. ISSN 1387-6988. eISSN 1572-5448. Available under: doi: 10.1080/13876988.2020.1822144BibTex
@article{HeinkelmannWild2022Yield-52087,
year={2022},
doi={10.1080/13876988.2020.1822144},
title={To Yield or Shield? : Comparing International Public Administrations' Responses to Member States' Policy Contestation},
number={3},
volume={24},
issn={1387-6988},
journal={Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice},
pages={296--312},
author={Heinkelmann-Wild, Tim and Jankauskas, Vytautas}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52087">
<dc:contributor>Jankauskas, Vytautas</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Jankauskas, Vytautas</dc:creator>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:contributor>Heinkelmann-Wild, Tim</dc:contributor>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-12-11T09:12:59Z</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Heinkelmann-Wild, Tim</dc:creator>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/52087"/>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
<dcterms:title>To Yield or Shield? : Comparing International Public Administrations' Responses to Member States' Policy Contestation</dcterms:title>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dcterms:issued>2022</dcterms:issued>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">When member states contest policymaking in international organizations, some international public administrations (IPAs) react in a conciliatory way while others are adversarial. This article argues that IPAs’ dependence on contesting states, their policymaking authority, and affectedness from contestation shape communicative responses. A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of 32 cases of contestation by the Trump administration indicates that IPAs yield when they are constrained by dependence on the United States or have no incentive to defend themselves. IPAs fend off contestation when they are unconstrained and incentivized by attacks on an international organizations’s polity, the bureaucracy, or policies in whose making they were substantially involved.</dcterms:abstract>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-12-11T09:12:59Z</dcterms:available>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>