Opting out from European Union legislation : the differentiation of secondary law
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
EU-Projektnummer
DFG-Projektnummer
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Differentiated integration in the European Union (EU) has been primarily discussed and analysed at the treaty level, whereas lack of systematic data has hampered the examination of secondary-law or legislative differentiation. We present a new data set of differentiation in EU legislation from 1958 to 2012, a descriptive analysis and a comparison of the patterns of primary- and secondary-law differentiation across time, member states and policies. We find that differentiation facilitating the accession of new members and constitutional differentiation accommodating the opposition against the integration of core state powers drive both primary- and secondary-law differentiation. In addition, we find complementarity between differentiation in treaty law and secondary legislation depending on the availability and salience of differentiation opportunities.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
DUTTLE, Thomas, Katharina HOLZINGER, Thomas MALANG, Thomas SCHÄUBLI, Frank SCHIMMELFENNIG, Thomas WINZEN, 2017. Opting out from European Union legislation : the differentiation of secondary law. In: Journal of European Public Policy. 2017, 24(3), pp. 406-428. ISSN 1350-1763. eISSN 1466-4429. Available under: doi: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1149206BibTex
@article{Duttle2017-03-09Optin-34614, year={2017}, doi={10.1080/13501763.2016.1149206}, title={Opting out from European Union legislation : the differentiation of secondary law}, number={3}, volume={24}, issn={1350-1763}, journal={Journal of European Public Policy}, pages={406--428}, author={Duttle, Thomas and Holzinger, Katharina and Malang, Thomas and Schäubli, Thomas and Schimmelfennig, Frank and Winzen, Thomas} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34614"> <dcterms:issued>2017-03-09</dcterms:issued> <dc:contributor>Malang, Thomas</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Malang, Thomas</dc:creator> <dcterms:title>Opting out from European Union legislation : the differentiation of secondary law</dcterms:title> <dc:creator>Schäubli, Thomas</dc:creator> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/34614/3/Duttle_0-346695.pdf"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/34614/3/Duttle_0-346695.pdf"/> <dc:contributor>Duttle, Thomas</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Schimmelfennig, Frank</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Holzinger, Katharina</dc:creator> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dc:creator>Winzen, Thomas</dc:creator> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dc:creator>Schimmelfennig, Frank</dc:creator> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:contributor>Schäubli, Thomas</dc:contributor> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Differentiated integration in the European Union (EU) has been primarily discussed and analysed at the treaty level, whereas lack of systematic data has hampered the examination of secondary-law or legislative differentiation. We present a new data set of differentiation in EU legislation from 1958 to 2012, a descriptive analysis and a comparison of the patterns of primary- and secondary-law differentiation across time, member states and policies. We find that differentiation facilitating the accession of new members and constitutional differentiation accommodating the opposition against the integration of core state powers drive both primary- and secondary-law differentiation. In addition, we find complementarity between differentiation in treaty law and secondary legislation depending on the availability and salience of differentiation opportunities.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:contributor>Winzen, Thomas</dc:contributor> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/34614"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Duttle, Thomas</dc:creator> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-07-01T08:10:49Z</dc:date> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-07-01T08:10:49Z</dcterms:available> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dc:contributor>Holzinger, Katharina</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>