Tactile motion lacks momentum

dc.contributor.authorMacauda, Gianluca
dc.contributor.authorLenggenhager, Bigna
dc.contributor.authorMeier, Rebekka
dc.contributor.authorEssick, Gregory
dc.contributor.authorBrugger, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-14T13:29:55Z
dc.date.available2022-03-14T13:29:55Z
dc.date.issued2018-09eng
dc.description.abstractThe displacement of the final position of a moving object in the direction of the observed motion path, i.e. an overestimation, is known as representational momentum. It has been described both in the visual and the auditory domain, and is suggested to be modality-independent. Here, we tested whether a representational momentum can also be demonstrated in the somatosensory domain. While the cognitive literature on representational momentum suggests that it can, previous work on the psychophysics of tactile motion perception would rather predict an underestimation of the perceived endpoint of a tactile stimulus. Tactile motion stimuli were applied on the left and the right dorsal forearms of 32 healthy participants, who were asked to indicate the subjectively perceived endpoint of the stimulation. Velocity, length and direction of the trajectory were varied. Contrary to the prediction based on the representational momentum literature, participants in our experiment significantly displaced the endpoint against the direction of movement (underestimation). The results are thus compatible with previous psychophysical findings on the perception of tactile motion. Further studies combining paradigms from classical psychophysics and cognitive psychology will be needed to resolve the apparently paradoxical predictions by the two literatures.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedeng
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00426-017-0879-1eng
dc.identifier.pmid28597136eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/56849
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsterms-of-use
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/
dc.subject.ddc150eng
dc.titleTactile motion lacks momentumeng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEeng
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Macauda2018-09Tacti-56849,
  year={2018},
  doi={10.1007/s00426-017-0879-1},
  title={Tactile motion lacks momentum},
  number={5},
  volume={82},
  issn={0340-0727},
  journal={Psychological Research},
  pages={889--895},
  author={Macauda, Gianluca and Lenggenhager, Bigna and Meier, Rebekka and Essick, Gregory and Brugger, Peter}
}
kops.citation.iso690MACAUDA, Gianluca, Bigna LENGGENHAGER, Rebekka MEIER, Gregory ESSICK, Peter BRUGGER, 2018. Tactile motion lacks momentum. In: Psychological Research. Springer. 2018, 82(5), pp. 889-895. ISSN 0340-0727. eISSN 1430-2772. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0879-1deu
kops.citation.iso690MACAUDA, Gianluca, Bigna LENGGENHAGER, Rebekka MEIER, Gregory ESSICK, Peter BRUGGER, 2018. Tactile motion lacks momentum. In: Psychological Research. Springer. 2018, 82(5), pp. 889-895. ISSN 0340-0727. eISSN 1430-2772. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0879-1eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/56849">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/56849"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Lenggenhager, Bigna</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Essick, Gregory</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>Tactile motion lacks momentum</dcterms:title>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Macauda, Gianluca</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Lenggenhager, Bigna</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Brugger, Peter</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-03-14T13:29:55Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-03-14T13:29:55Z</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:issued>2018-09</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>Macauda, Gianluca</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Brugger, Peter</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Meier, Rebekka</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The displacement of the final position of a moving object in the direction of the observed motion path, i.e. an overestimation, is known as representational momentum. It has been described both in the visual and the auditory domain, and is suggested to be modality-independent. Here, we tested whether a representational momentum can also be demonstrated in the somatosensory domain. While the cognitive literature on representational momentum suggests that it can, previous work on the psychophysics of tactile motion perception would rather predict an underestimation of the perceived endpoint of a tactile stimulus. Tactile motion stimuli were applied on the left and the right dorsal forearms of 32 healthy participants, who were asked to indicate the subjectively perceived endpoint of the stimulation. Velocity, length and direction of the trajectory were varied. Contrary to the prediction based on the representational momentum literature, participants in our experiment significantly displaced the endpoint against the direction of movement (underestimation). The results are thus compatible with previous psychophysical findings on the perception of tactile motion. Further studies combining paradigms from classical psychophysics and cognitive psychology will be needed to resolve the apparently paradoxical predictions by the two literatures.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Essick, Gregory</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Meier, Rebekka</dc:creator>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.flag.isPeerReviewedtrueeng
kops.flag.knbibliographyfalse
kops.sourcefieldPsychological Research. Springer. 2018, <b>82</b>(5), pp. 889-895. ISSN 0340-0727. eISSN 1430-2772. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0879-1deu
kops.sourcefield.plainPsychological Research. Springer. 2018, 82(5), pp. 889-895. ISSN 0340-0727. eISSN 1430-2772. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0879-1deu
kops.sourcefield.plainPsychological Research. Springer. 2018, 82(5), pp. 889-895. ISSN 0340-0727. eISSN 1430-2772. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0879-1eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationddac0217-80b6-4c07-a89f-26b4b186c3a6
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryddac0217-80b6-4c07-a89f-26b4b186c3a6
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage889eng
source.bibliographicInfo.issue5eng
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage895eng
source.bibliographicInfo.volume82eng
source.identifier.eissn1430-2772eng
source.identifier.issn0340-0727eng
source.periodicalTitlePsychological Researcheng
source.publisherSpringereng

Dateien