The more microplastic types pollute the soil, the stronger the growth suppression of invasive alien and native plants

dc.contributor.authorFu, Yanmei
dc.contributor.authorvan Kleunen, Mark
dc.contributor.authorMa, Kai
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Yanjie
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-08T08:02:37Z
dc.date.available2024-05-08T08:02:37Z
dc.date.issued2024-07
dc.description.abstract1. The ecological consequences of microplastic pollution for plants remain largely unknown, and the few studies that tested the effects usually focused on a single type of microplastic and a single plant species. However, most plants will be exposed to multiple microplastic types simultaneously, and the effects may vary among species. 2. To test the effects of microplastic diversity on plants, we grew single plants of eight invasive and eight native species in pots with substrate polluted with 0, 1, 3 and 6 types of microplastics. 3. We found that the growth suppression by microplastic pollution became stronger with the number of microplastic types the plants were exposed to. This tended to be particularly the case for invasive species, as their biomass advantage over natives diminished with the number of microplastic types. The biomass responses coincided with a positive effect of the number of microplastic types on root allocation and thickness, which was also stronger for invasive than for native species. In addition, the results of hierarchical diversity–interaction models suggest that the negative impact of microplastic diversity on the total biomass of invasive plant species was influenced by both the identities of the microplastic and certain types of microplastic with strong pairwise interactions. In contrast, the effect on native species was determined solely by the microplastic identities. 4. Synthesis. Our multispecies study thus shows for the first time that the negative effects of microplastic pollution on plant growth increase with the number of microplastic types. We also found tentative evidence that the negative impacts of microplastic diversity were more pronounced for invasive plants compared to native plants, and that this might be due to differences in the responses of root allocation and thickness.
dc.description.versionpublisheddeu
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1365-2745.14316
dc.identifier.ppn1903002931
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/69946
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.uriSuppData Data are available from the Dryad:
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.fbg79cp3c
dc.subjectexotic
dc.subjectglobal change
dc.subjectinvasiveness
dc.subjectmicroplastic diversity
dc.subjectnon-native
dc.subjectstress
dc.subject.ddc570
dc.titleThe more microplastic types pollute the soil, the stronger the growth suppression of invasive alien and native plantseng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLE
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Fu2024-07micro-69946,
  title={The more microplastic types pollute the soil, the stronger the growth suppression of invasive alien and native plants},
  year={2024},
  doi={10.1111/1365-2745.14316},
  number={7},
  volume={112},
  issn={0022-0477},
  journal={Journal of Ecology},
  pages={1444--1457},
  author={Fu, Yanmei and van Kleunen, Mark and Ma, Kai and Liu, Yanjie}
}
kops.citation.iso690FU, Yanmei, Mark VAN KLEUNEN, Kai MA, Yanjie LIU, 2024. The more microplastic types pollute the soil, the stronger the growth suppression of invasive alien and native plants. In: Journal of Ecology. Wiley. 2024, 112(7), S. 1444-1457. ISSN 0022-0477. eISSN 1365-2745. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.14316deu
kops.citation.iso690FU, Yanmei, Mark VAN KLEUNEN, Kai MA, Yanjie LIU, 2024. The more microplastic types pollute the soil, the stronger the growth suppression of invasive alien and native plants. In: Journal of Ecology. Wiley. 2024, 112(7), pp. 1444-1457. ISSN 0022-0477. eISSN 1365-2745. Available under: doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.14316eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/69946">
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2024-05-08T08:02:37Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Liu, Yanjie</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Liu, Yanjie</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract>1. The ecological consequences of microplastic pollution for plants remain largely unknown, and the few studies that tested the effects usually focused on a single type of microplastic and a single plant species. However, most plants will be exposed to multiple microplastic types simultaneously, and the effects may vary among species.

2. To test the effects of microplastic diversity on plants, we grew single plants of eight invasive and eight native species in pots with substrate polluted with 0, 1, 3 and 6 types of microplastics.

3. We found that the growth suppression by microplastic pollution became stronger with the number of microplastic types the plants were exposed to. This tended to be particularly the case for invasive species, as their biomass advantage over natives diminished with the number of microplastic types. The biomass responses coincided with a positive effect of the number of microplastic types on root allocation and thickness, which was also stronger for invasive than for native species. In addition, the results of hierarchical diversity–interaction models suggest that the negative impact of microplastic diversity on the total biomass of invasive plant species was influenced by both the identities of the microplastic and certain types of microplastic with strong pairwise interactions. In contrast, the effect on native species was determined solely by the microplastic identities.

4. Synthesis. Our multispecies study thus shows for the first time that the negative effects of microplastic pollution on plant growth increase with the number of microplastic types. We also found tentative evidence that the negative impacts of microplastic diversity were more pronounced for invasive plants compared to native plants, and that this might be due to differences in the responses of root allocation and thickness.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Fu, Yanmei</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>van Kleunen, Mark</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/69946/1/Fu_2-nowjw39rhbuu1.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2024-05-08T08:02:37Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>van Kleunen, Mark</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Fu, Yanmei</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Ma, Kai</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/69946"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2024-07</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>Ma, Kai</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:title>The more microplastic types pollute the soil, the stronger the growth suppression of invasive alien and native plants</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/69946/1/Fu_2-nowjw39rhbuu1.pdf"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.funding{"second":"Y9B7041001","first":"nsfc"}
kops.description.openAccessopenaccessgreen
kops.flag.isPeerReviewedtrue
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-nowjw39rhbuu1
kops.sourcefieldJournal of Ecology. Wiley. 2024, <b>112</b>(7), S. 1444-1457. ISSN 0022-0477. eISSN 1365-2745. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.14316deu
kops.sourcefield.plainJournal of Ecology. Wiley. 2024, 112(7), S. 1444-1457. ISSN 0022-0477. eISSN 1365-2745. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.14316deu
kops.sourcefield.plainJournal of Ecology. Wiley. 2024, 112(7), pp. 1444-1457. ISSN 0022-0477. eISSN 1365-2745. Available under: doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.14316eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication391aca7a-4bda-4266-9bad-7488dd4b0126
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf7daa735-a96d-411e-b98d-9d03ed6755d0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery391aca7a-4bda-4266-9bad-7488dd4b0126
relation.isDatasetOfPublication1d094b8c-1206-4b31-80b4-98cfb5ce2c83
relation.isDatasetOfPublication.latestForDiscovery1d094b8c-1206-4b31-80b4-98cfb5ce2c83
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage1444
source.bibliographicInfo.issue7
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage1457
source.bibliographicInfo.volume112
source.identifier.eissn1365-2745
source.identifier.issn0022-0477
source.periodicalTitleJournal of Ecology
source.publisherWiley
temp.description.funding{"first":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","second":"Y9B7041001"}

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Fu_2-nowjw39rhbuu1.pdf
Größe:
1.73 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Fu_2-nowjw39rhbuu1.pdf
Fu_2-nowjw39rhbuu1.pdfGröße: 1.73 MBDownloads: 71