Comparative Politics : Some Points for Discussion
| dc.contributor.author | Kersbergen, Kees van | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-09-02T09:12:12Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2016-09-02T09:12:12Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | eng |
| dc.description.abstract | This article is the result of concern about some developments in comparative politics, and it offers some points for discussion. It seems that three trends unduly confine the domain, scope and quality of research in the field. The subdiscipline (1) hardly deals with the social sources of political phenomena anymore and is disproportionally engaged with institutional analysis, (2) almost exclusively focuses on questions of (cross-national) variation and disregards important issues of similarity, and (3) too easily, and without reflection on the history of the field, produces ‘new’ theories and concepts in reaction to the charge that its central concepts (particularly the state) have become theoretically obsolete and empirically valueless. | eng |
| dc.description.version | published | eng |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1057/eps.2009.45 | eng |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/35099 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | eng |
| dc.subject.ddc | 320 | eng |
| dc.title | Comparative Politics : Some Points for Discussion | eng |
| dc.type | JOURNAL_ARTICLE | eng |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| kops.citation.bibtex | @article{Kersbergen2010Compa-35099,
year={2010},
doi={10.1057/eps.2009.45},
title={Comparative Politics : Some Points for Discussion},
number={1},
volume={9},
issn={1680-4333},
journal={European Political Science},
pages={49--61},
author={Kersbergen, Kees van}
} | |
| kops.citation.iso690 | KERSBERGEN, Kees van, 2010. Comparative Politics : Some Points for Discussion. In: European Political Science. 2010, 9(1), pp. 49-61. ISSN 1680-4333. eISSN 1682-0983. Available under: doi: 10.1057/eps.2009.45 | deu |
| kops.citation.iso690 | KERSBERGEN, Kees van, 2010. Comparative Politics : Some Points for Discussion. In: European Political Science. 2010, 9(1), pp. 49-61. ISSN 1680-4333. eISSN 1682-0983. Available under: doi: 10.1057/eps.2009.45 | eng |
| kops.citation.rdf | <rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/35099">
<dc:creator>Kersbergen, Kees van</dc:creator>
<dcterms:issued>2010</dcterms:issued>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-09-02T09:12:12Z</dcterms:available>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34438"/>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This article is the result of concern about some developments in comparative politics, and it offers some points for discussion. It seems that three trends unduly confine the domain, scope and quality of research in the field. The subdiscipline (1) hardly deals with the social sources of political phenomena anymore and is disproportionally engaged with institutional analysis, (2) almost exclusively focuses on questions of (cross-national) variation and disregards important issues of similarity, and (3) too easily, and without reflection on the history of the field, produces ‘new’ theories and concepts in reaction to the charge that its central concepts (particularly the state) have become theoretically obsolete and empirically valueless.</dcterms:abstract>
<dcterms:title>Comparative Politics : Some Points for Discussion</dcterms:title>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-09-02T09:12:12Z</dc:date>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34438"/>
<dc:contributor>Kersbergen, Kees van</dc:contributor>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/35099"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> | |
| kops.sourcefield | European Political Science. 2010, <b>9</b>(1), pp. 49-61. ISSN 1680-4333. eISSN 1682-0983. Available under: doi: 10.1057/eps.2009.45 | deu |
| kops.sourcefield.plain | European Political Science. 2010, 9(1), pp. 49-61. ISSN 1680-4333. eISSN 1682-0983. Available under: doi: 10.1057/eps.2009.45 | deu |
| kops.sourcefield.plain | European Political Science. 2010, 9(1), pp. 49-61. ISSN 1680-4333. eISSN 1682-0983. Available under: doi: 10.1057/eps.2009.45 | eng |
| source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage | 49 | eng |
| source.bibliographicInfo.issue | 1 | eng |
| source.bibliographicInfo.toPage | 61 | eng |
| source.bibliographicInfo.volume | 9 | eng |
| source.identifier.eissn | 1682-0983 | eng |
| source.identifier.issn | 1680-4333 | eng |
| source.periodicalTitle | European Political Science | eng |