Publikation: Hopes and disappointments : regime change and support for democracy after the Arab Uprisings
Lade...
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2020
Autor:innen
Kilavuz, M. Tahir
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Democratization. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 2020, 27(5), pp. 854-873. ISSN 1351-0347. eISSN 1743-890X. Available under: doi: 10.1080/13510347.2020.1746766
Zusammenfassung
What happened to citizens’ support for democracy after the Arab Uprisings? Did the support increase, stay the same, or actually decrease after all the protests, regime changes, and reforms? Which theories of citizens’ political attitudes best explain these dynamics? Analysing two waves of the Arab Barometer surveys and employing an item-response method that offers methodological improvements compared to previous studies, this article finds that support for democracy actually decreased in countries that successfully overthrew their dictators during the Uprisings. Following the arguments that emphasize the rational evaluations of citizens, it argues that in countries that had an experience with a freer political system, such as Egypt, Tunisia, and Yemen, challenges of democratization and the poor political and economic performances of the governments left citizens disappointed. Despite the hopes that people had at the onset of the Uprisings, the disappointments generated by the unmet expectations eventually led to a decline in support for democracy.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik
Schlagwörter
support for democracy, the Arab Uprisings, political and economic performance, regime change, item-response theory
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
KILAVUZ, M. Tahir, Nathanael Gratias SUMAKTOYO, 2020. Hopes and disappointments : regime change and support for democracy after the Arab Uprisings. In: Democratization. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 2020, 27(5), pp. 854-873. ISSN 1351-0347. eISSN 1743-890X. Available under: doi: 10.1080/13510347.2020.1746766BibTex
@article{Kilavuz2020Hopes-54170,
year={2020},
doi={10.1080/13510347.2020.1746766},
title={Hopes and disappointments : regime change and support for democracy after the Arab Uprisings},
number={5},
volume={27},
issn={1351-0347},
journal={Democratization},
pages={854--873},
author={Kilavuz, M. Tahir and Sumaktoyo, Nathanael Gratias}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/54170">
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:contributor>Sumaktoyo, Nathanael Gratias</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/54170"/>
<dc:creator>Kilavuz, M. Tahir</dc:creator>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dcterms:title>Hopes and disappointments : regime change and support for democracy after the Arab Uprisings</dcterms:title>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">What happened to citizens’ support for democracy after the Arab Uprisings? Did the support increase, stay the same, or actually decrease after all the protests, regime changes, and reforms? Which theories of citizens’ political attitudes best explain these dynamics? Analysing two waves of the Arab Barometer surveys and employing an item-response method that offers methodological improvements compared to previous studies, this article finds that support for democracy actually decreased in countries that successfully overthrew their dictators during the Uprisings. Following the arguments that emphasize the rational evaluations of citizens, it argues that in countries that had an experience with a freer political system, such as Egypt, Tunisia, and Yemen, challenges of democratization and the poor political and economic performances of the governments left citizens disappointed. Despite the hopes that people had at the onset of the Uprisings, the disappointments generated by the unmet expectations eventually led to a decline in support for democracy.</dcterms:abstract>
<dcterms:issued>2020</dcterms:issued>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-07-01T12:20:18Z</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>Kilavuz, M. Tahir</dc:contributor>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-07-01T12:20:18Z</dcterms:available>
<dc:creator>Sumaktoyo, Nathanael Gratias</dc:creator>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
