Presumptions and Conjectures in Leibniz’s Legal Theory

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2015
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Sammelband
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
ARMGARDT, Matthias, ed., Patrice CANIVEZ, ed., Sandrine CHASSAGNARD-PINET, ed.. Past and Present Interactions in Legal Reasoning and Logic : Part II. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015, pp. 51-69. Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning. 7. ISBN 978-3-319-16020-7. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-16021-4_4
Zusammenfassung

This paper focuses on the role of presumptions and conjectures in Leibniz’s legal theory. Both presumptions and conjectures are closely connected to the question of the burden of proof for presumptions lead to a shift of the burden. Thus, these notions play an essential role in the practice of litigation: the odds to win a given case are stacked against the party that has to bear the burden of proof. The paper analyses three different texts which bear upon the topic and stem from different phases of Leibniz’s production: the Elementa Juris Naturalis (1671), the De legum interpretatione, rationibus, applicatione, systemate (1678/1679), and the Nouveaux Essais sur l’entendement humain (1704, published posthumously in 1765). The aim of the paper is to elucidate how Leibniz developed a subtle theory of legal presumptions and conjectures. Moreover, the paper attempts a first formal reconstruction of this theory.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
340 Recht
Schlagwörter
Legal presumptions, Legal conjectures, Law and logic, Leibniz
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Datensätze
Zitieren
ISO 690ARMGARDT, Matthias, 2015. Presumptions and Conjectures in Leibniz’s Legal Theory. In: ARMGARDT, Matthias, ed., Patrice CANIVEZ, ed., Sandrine CHASSAGNARD-PINET, ed.. Past and Present Interactions in Legal Reasoning and Logic : Part II. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015, pp. 51-69. Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning. 7. ISBN 978-3-319-16020-7. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-16021-4_4
BibTex
@incollection{Armgardt2015Presu-33373,
  year={2015},
  doi={10.1007/978-3-319-16021-4_4},
  title={Presumptions and Conjectures in Leibniz’s Legal Theory},
  number={7},
  isbn={978-3-319-16020-7},
  publisher={Springer International Publishing},
  address={Cham},
  series={Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning},
  booktitle={Past and Present Interactions in Legal Reasoning and Logic : Part II},
  pages={51--69},
  editor={Armgardt, Matthias and Canivez, Patrice and Chassagnard-Pinet, Sandrine},
  author={Armgardt, Matthias}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/33373">
    <dc:creator>Armgardt, Matthias</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2015</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:title>Presumptions and Conjectures in Leibniz’s Legal Theory</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-03-18T07:53:57Z</dc:date>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/33373"/>
    <dc:contributor>Armgardt, Matthias</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-03-18T07:53:57Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This paper focuses on the role of presumptions and conjectures in Leibniz’s legal theory. Both presumptions and conjectures are closely connected to the question of the burden of proof for presumptions lead to a shift of the burden. Thus, these notions play an essential role in the practice of litigation: the odds to win a given case are stacked against the party that has to bear the burden of proof. The paper analyses three different texts which bear upon the topic and stem from different phases of Leibniz’s production: the Elementa Juris Naturalis (1671), the De legum interpretatione, rationibus, applicatione, systemate (1678/1679), and the Nouveaux Essais sur l’entendement humain (1704, published posthumously in 1765). The aim of the paper is to elucidate how Leibniz developed a subtle theory of legal presumptions and conjectures. Moreover, the paper attempts a first formal reconstruction of this theory.</dcterms:abstract>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen

Versionsgeschichte

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
VersionDatumZusammenfassung
1*
2016-03-18 07:53:57
* Ausgewählte Version