Separation, Composition, or Hybrid? : Comparing Collaborative 3D Object Manipulation Techniques for Handheld Augmented Reality

Wieland, Jonathan; Zagermann, Johannes; Müller, Jens; Reiterer, Harald

Separation, Composition, or Hybrid? : Comparing Collaborative 3D Object Manipulation Techniques for Handheld Augmented Reality

Dateien

Wieland_2-ahkg9sntr33e8.pdfGröße: 1.82 MBDownloads: 843

Datum

2021

Projekt

SFB TRR 161 TP C 01 Quantitative Messung von Interaktion

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Open Access Green

Sammlungen

Informatik und Informationswissenschaft

Publikationstyp

Beitrag zu einem Konferenzband

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

2021 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2021, pp. 403-412. ISBN 978-1-66540-158-6. Available under: doi: 10.1109/ISMAR52148.2021.00057

Zusammenfassung

Augmented Reality (AR) supported collaboration is a popular topic in HCI research. Previous work has shown the benefits of collaborative 3D object manipulation and identified two possibilities: Either separate or compose users’ inputs. However, their experimental comparison using handheld AR displays is still missing. We, therefore, conducted an experiment in which we tasked 24 dyads with collaboratively positioning virtual objects in handheld AR using three manipulation techniques: 1) Separation – performing only different manipulation tasks (i. e., translation or rotation) simultaneously, 2) Composition – performing only the same manipulation tasks simultaneously and combining individual inputs using a merge policy, and 3) Hybrid – performing any manipulation tasks simultaneously, enabling dynamic transitions between Separation and Composition. While all techniques were similarly effective, Composition was least efficient, with higher subjective workload and worse user experience. Preferences were polarized between clear work division (Separation) and freedom of action (Hybrid). Based on our findings, we offer research and design implications.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

004 Informatik

Schlagwörter

Augmented reality, mobile devices, collaborative 3D object manipulation

Konferenz

2021 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), 4. Okt. 2021 - 8. Okt. 2021, Bari, Italy

Zitieren

ISO 690

WIELAND, Jonathan, Johannes ZAGERMANN, Jens MÜLLER, Harald REITERER, 2021. Separation, Composition, or Hybrid? : Comparing Collaborative 3D Object Manipulation Techniques for Handheld Augmented Reality. 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). Bari, Italy, 4. Okt. 2021 - 8. Okt. 2021. In: 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2021, pp. 403-412. ISBN 978-1-66540-158-6. Available under: doi: 10.1109/ISMAR52148.2021.00057

BibTex

@inproceedings{Wieland2021Separ-55129,
  year={2021},
  doi={10.1109/ISMAR52148.2021.00057},
  title={Separation, Composition, or Hybrid? : Comparing Collaborative 3D Object Manipulation Techniques for Handheld Augmented Reality},
  isbn={978-1-66540-158-6},
  publisher={IEEE},
  address={Piscataway, NJ},
  booktitle={2021 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality},
  pages={403--412},
  author={Wieland, Jonathan and Zagermann, Johannes and Müller, Jens and Reiterer, Harald}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/55129">
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/>
    <dc:contributor>Zagermann, Johannes</dc:contributor>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-10-04T13:58:16Z</dc:date>
    <dc:contributor>Reiterer, Harald</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Müller, Jens</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Wieland, Jonathan</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Zagermann, Johannes</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2021</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:title>Separation, Composition, or Hybrid? : Comparing Collaborative 3D Object Manipulation Techniques for Handheld Augmented Reality</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/55129/3/Wieland_2-ahkg9sntr33e8.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/55129/3/Wieland_2-ahkg9sntr33e8.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Müller, Jens</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Reiterer, Harald</dc:creator>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/55129"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:creator>Wieland, Jonathan</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-10-04T13:58:16Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Augmented Reality (AR) supported collaboration is a popular topic in HCI research. Previous work has shown the benefits of collaborative 3D object manipulation and identified two possibilities: Either separate or compose users’ inputs. However, their experimental comparison using handheld AR displays is still missing. We, therefore, conducted an experiment in which we tasked 24 dyads with collaboratively positioning virtual objects in handheld AR using three manipulation techniques: 1) Separation – performing only different manipulation tasks (i. e., translation or rotation) simultaneously, 2) Composition – performing only the same manipulation tasks simultaneously and combining individual inputs using a merge policy, and 3) Hybrid – performing any manipulation tasks simultaneously, enabling dynamic transitions between Separation and Composition. While all techniques were similarly effective, Composition was least efficient, with higher subjective workload and worse user experience. Preferences were polarized between clear work division (Separation) and freedom of action (Hybrid). Based on our findings, we offer research and design implications.</dcterms:abstract>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja