Linking animal movement and remote sensing : mapping resource suitability from a remote sensing perspective

dc.contributor.authorRemelgado, Ruben
dc.contributor.authorLeutner, Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorSafi, Kamran
dc.contributor.authorSonnenschein, Ruth
dc.contributor.authorKuebert, Carina
dc.contributor.authorWegmann, Martin
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-11T08:59:01Z
dc.date.available2020-12-11T08:59:01Z
dc.date.issued2018-09eng
dc.description.abstractOptical remote sensing is an important tool in the study of animal behavior providing ecologists with the means to understand species–environment interactions in combination with animal movement data. However, differences in spatial and temporal resolution between movement and remote sensing data limit their direct assimilation. In this context, we built a data‐driven framework to map resource suitability that addresses these differences as well as the limitations of satellite imagery. It combines seasonal composites of multiyear surface reflectances and optimized presence and absence samples acquired with animal movement data within a cross‐validation modeling scheme. Moreover, it responds to dynamic, site‐specific environmental conditions making it applicable to contrasting landscapes. We tested this framework using five populations of White Storks (Ciconia ciconia) to model resource suitability related to foraging achieving accuracies from 0.40 to 0.94 for presences and 0.66 to 0.93 for absences. These results were influenced by the temporal composition of the seasonal reflectances indicated by the lower accuracies associated with higher day differences in relation to the target dates. Additionally, population differences in resource selection influenced our results marked by the negative relationship between the model accuracies and the variability of the surface reflectances associated with the presence samples. Our modeling approach spatially splits presences between training and validation. As a result, when these represent different and unique resources, we face a negative bias during validation. Despite these inaccuracies, our framework offers an important basis to analyze species–environment interactions. As it standardizes site‐dependent behavioral and environmental characteristics, it can be used in the comparison of intra‐ and interspecies environmental requirements and improves the analysis of resource selection along migratory paths. Moreover, due to its sensitivity to differences in resource selection, our approach can contribute toward a better understanding of species requirements.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedeng
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/rse2.70eng
dc.identifier.ppn1742597114
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/52086
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectLandsat, movement ecology, optical remote sensing, resource mapping, resource suitability, surface reflectanceseng
dc.subject.ddc570eng
dc.titleLinking animal movement and remote sensing : mapping resource suitability from a remote sensing perspectiveeng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEeng
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Remelgado2018-09Linki-52086,
  year={2018},
  doi={10.1002/rse2.70},
  title={Linking animal movement and remote sensing : mapping resource suitability from a remote sensing perspective},
  number={3},
  volume={4},
  journal={Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation},
  pages={211--224},
  author={Remelgado, Ruben and Leutner, Benjamin and Safi, Kamran and Sonnenschein, Ruth and Kuebert, Carina and Wegmann, Martin}
}
kops.citation.iso690REMELGADO, Ruben, Benjamin LEUTNER, Kamran SAFI, Ruth SONNENSCHEIN, Carina KUEBERT, Martin WEGMANN, 2018. Linking animal movement and remote sensing : mapping resource suitability from a remote sensing perspective. In: Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. Wiley-Blackwell. 2018, 4(3), pp. 211-224. eISSN 2056-3485. Available under: doi: 10.1002/rse2.70deu
kops.citation.iso690REMELGADO, Ruben, Benjamin LEUTNER, Kamran SAFI, Ruth SONNENSCHEIN, Carina KUEBERT, Martin WEGMANN, 2018. Linking animal movement and remote sensing : mapping resource suitability from a remote sensing perspective. In: Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. Wiley-Blackwell. 2018, 4(3), pp. 211-224. eISSN 2056-3485. Available under: doi: 10.1002/rse2.70eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52086">
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/52086"/>
    <dc:contributor>Remelgado, Ruben</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Safi, Kamran</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2018-09</dcterms:issued>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:creator>Leutner, Benjamin</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Sonnenschein, Ruth</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/52086/3/Remelgado_2-9vuh9urfn3oc6.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Sonnenschein, Ruth</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-12-11T08:59:01Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:title>Linking animal movement and remote sensing : mapping resource suitability from a remote sensing perspective</dcterms:title>
    <dc:contributor>Kuebert, Carina</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/52086/3/Remelgado_2-9vuh9urfn3oc6.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Safi, Kamran</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Optical remote sensing is an important tool in the study of animal behavior providing ecologists with the means to understand species–environment interactions in combination with animal movement data. However, differences in spatial and temporal resolution between movement and remote sensing data limit their direct assimilation. In this context, we built a data‐driven framework to map resource suitability that addresses these differences as well as the limitations of satellite imagery. It combines seasonal composites of multiyear surface reflectances and optimized presence and absence samples acquired with animal movement data within a cross‐validation modeling scheme. Moreover, it responds to dynamic, site‐specific environmental conditions making it applicable to contrasting landscapes. We tested this framework using five populations of White Storks (Ciconia ciconia) to model resource suitability related to foraging achieving accuracies from 0.40 to 0.94 for presences and 0.66 to 0.93 for absences. These results were influenced by the temporal composition of the seasonal reflectances indicated by the lower accuracies associated with higher day differences in relation to the target dates. Additionally, population differences in resource selection influenced our results marked by the negative relationship between the model accuracies and the variability of the surface reflectances associated with the presence samples. Our modeling approach spatially splits presences between training and validation. As a result, when these represent different and unique resources, we face a negative bias during validation. Despite these inaccuracies, our framework offers an important basis to analyze species–environment interactions. As it standardizes site‐dependent behavioral and environmental characteristics, it can be used in the comparison of intra‐ and interspecies environmental requirements and improves the analysis of resource selection along migratory paths. Moreover, due to its sensitivity to differences in resource selection, our approach can contribute toward a better understanding of species requirements.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Wegmann, Martin</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Leutner, Benjamin</dc:contributor>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-12-11T08:59:01Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Wegmann, Martin</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:creator>Kuebert, Carina</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Remelgado, Ruben</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.openAccessopenaccessgoldeng
kops.flag.isPeerReviewedtrueeng
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-9vuh9urfn3oc6
kops.sourcefieldRemote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. Wiley-Blackwell. 2018, <b>4</b>(3), pp. 211-224. eISSN 2056-3485. Available under: doi: 10.1002/rse2.70deu
kops.sourcefield.plainRemote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. Wiley-Blackwell. 2018, 4(3), pp. 211-224. eISSN 2056-3485. Available under: doi: 10.1002/rse2.70deu
kops.sourcefield.plainRemote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. Wiley-Blackwell. 2018, 4(3), pp. 211-224. eISSN 2056-3485. Available under: doi: 10.1002/rse2.70eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf5ebb992-955c-450e-a299-0318a28a0d03
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf5ebb992-955c-450e-a299-0318a28a0d03
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage211eng
source.bibliographicInfo.issue3eng
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage224eng
source.bibliographicInfo.volume4eng
source.identifier.eissn2056-3485eng
source.periodicalTitleRemote Sensing in Ecology and Conservationeng
source.publisherWiley-Blackwelleng

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Remelgado_2-9vuh9urfn3oc6.pdf
Größe:
1.1 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Beschreibung:
Remelgado_2-9vuh9urfn3oc6.pdf
Remelgado_2-9vuh9urfn3oc6.pdfGröße: 1.1 MBDownloads: 535

Lizenzbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
license.txt
Größe:
3.96 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Beschreibung:
license.txt
license.txtGröße: 3.96 KBDownloads: 0