Defusing easy arguments for numbers

Balcerak Jackson, Brendan

Defusing easy arguments for numbers

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2013

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

unikn.publication.listelement.citation.prefix.version.undefined

Linguistics and Philosophy. 2013, 36(6), pp. 447-461. ISSN 0165-0157. eISSN 1573-0549. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s10988-013-9142-4

Zusammenfassung

Pairs of sentences like the following pose a problem for ontology: (1) Jupiter has four moons. (2) The number of moons of Jupiter is four. (2) is intuitively a trivial paraphrase of (1). And yet while (1) seems ontologically innocent, (2) appears to imply the existence of numbers. Thomas Hofweber proposes that we can resolve the puzzle by recognizing that sentence (2) is syntactically derived from, and has the same meaning as, sentence (1). Despite appearances, the expressions ‘the number of moons of Jupiter’ and ‘four’ do not function semantically as singular terms in (2). Hofweber’s primary evidence for this proposal concerns differences in the focus-related communicative functions of (1) and (2). In this paper I raise several serious problems for Hofweber’s proposal, and for his attempt to support it by appeal to focus-related phenomena. I conclude by offering independent evidence for an alternative, purely pragmatic resolution of the ontological puzzle.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

100 Philosophie

Zitieren

ISO 690

BALCERAK JACKSON, Brendan, 2013. Defusing easy arguments for numbers. In: Linguistics and Philosophy. 2013, 36(6), pp. 447-461. ISSN 0165-0157. eISSN 1573-0549. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s10988-013-9142-4

BibTex

@article{BalcerakJackson2013Defus-26617,
  year={2013},
  doi={10.1007/s10988-013-9142-4},
  title={Defusing easy arguments for numbers},
  number={6},
  volume={36},
  issn={0165-0157},
  journal={Linguistics and Philosophy},
  pages={447--461},
  author={Balcerak Jackson, Brendan}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/26617">
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Linguistics and Philosophy ; 36 (2013), 6. - S. 447-461</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dc:creator>Balcerak Jackson, Brendan</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-03-04T09:45:45Z</dcterms:available>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/26617"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Pairs of sentences like the following pose a problem for ontology: (1) Jupiter has four moons. (2) The number of moons of Jupiter is four. (2) is intuitively a trivial paraphrase of (1). And yet while (1) seems ontologically innocent, (2) appears to imply the existence of numbers. Thomas Hofweber proposes that we can resolve the puzzle by recognizing that sentence (2) is syntactically derived from, and has the same meaning as, sentence (1). Despite appearances, the expressions ‘the number of moons of Jupiter’ and ‘four’ do not function semantically as singular terms in (2). Hofweber’s primary evidence for this proposal concerns differences in the focus-related communicative functions of (1) and (2). In this paper I raise several serious problems for Hofweber’s proposal, and for his attempt to support it by appeal to focus-related phenomena. I conclude by offering independent evidence for an alternative, purely pragmatic resolution of the ontological puzzle.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:title>Defusing easy arguments for numbers</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2013</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:contributor>Balcerak Jackson, Brendan</dc:contributor>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-03-04T09:45:45Z</dc:date>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja