Twitter use in election campaigns : A systematic literature review

dc.contributor.authorJungherr, Andreas
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-20T10:35:56Z
dc.date.available2016-12-20T10:35:56Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-02eng
dc.description.abstractTwitter has become a pervasive tool in election campaigns. Candidates, parties, journalists, and a steadily increasing share of the public are using Twitter to comment on, interact around, and research public reactions to politics. These uses have met with growing scholarly attention. As of now, this research is fragmented, lacks a common body of evidence, and shared approaches to data collection and selection. This article presents the results of a systematic literature review of 127 studies addressing the use of Twitter in election campaigns. In this systematic review, I will discuss the available research with regard to findings on the use of Twitter by parties, candidates, and publics during election campaigns and during mediated campaign events. Also, I will address prominent research designs and approaches to data collection and selection.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedeng
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/36429
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.subject.ddc320eng
dc.titleTwitter use in election campaigns : A systematic literature revieweng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEeng
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Jungherr2016-01-02Twitt-36429,
  year={2016},
  doi={10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401},
  title={Twitter use in election campaigns : A systematic literature review},
  number={1},
  volume={13},
  issn={1933-1681},
  journal={Journal of Information Technology & Politics : JITP},
  pages={72--91},
  author={Jungherr, Andreas}
}
kops.citation.iso690JUNGHERR, Andreas, 2016. Twitter use in election campaigns : A systematic literature review. In: Journal of Information Technology & Politics : JITP. 2016, 13(1), pp. 72-91. ISSN 1933-1681. eISSN 1933-169X. Available under: doi: 10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401deu
kops.citation.iso690JUNGHERR, Andreas, 2016. Twitter use in election campaigns : A systematic literature review. In: Journal of Information Technology & Politics : JITP. 2016, 13(1), pp. 72-91. ISSN 1933-1681. eISSN 1933-169X. Available under: doi: 10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36429">
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:contributor>Jungherr, Andreas</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Twitter has become a pervasive tool in election campaigns. Candidates, parties, journalists, and a steadily increasing share of the public are using Twitter to comment on, interact around, and research public reactions to politics. These uses have met with growing scholarly attention. As of now, this research is fragmented, lacks a common body of evidence, and shared approaches to data collection and selection. This article presents the results of a systematic literature review of 127 studies addressing the use of Twitter in election campaigns. In this systematic review, I will discuss the available research with regard to findings on the use of Twitter by parties, candidates, and publics during election campaigns and during mediated campaign events. Also, I will address prominent research designs and approaches to data collection and selection.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:title>Twitter use in election campaigns : A systematic literature review</dcterms:title>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/36429"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:issued>2016-01-02</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-12-20T10:35:56Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Jungherr, Andreas</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-12-20T10:35:56Z</dcterms:available>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.sourcefieldJournal of Information Technology & Politics : JITP. 2016, <b>13</b>(1), pp. 72-91. ISSN 1933-1681. eISSN 1933-169X. Available under: doi: 10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401deu
kops.sourcefield.plainJournal of Information Technology & Politics : JITP. 2016, 13(1), pp. 72-91. ISSN 1933-1681. eISSN 1933-169X. Available under: doi: 10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401deu
kops.sourcefield.plainJournal of Information Technology & Politics : JITP. 2016, 13(1), pp. 72-91. ISSN 1933-1681. eISSN 1933-169X. Available under: doi: 10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1b0e2b39-c3b2-4a49-bdeb-3089b30ae330
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery1b0e2b39-c3b2-4a49-bdeb-3089b30ae330
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage72eng
source.bibliographicInfo.issue1eng
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage91eng
source.bibliographicInfo.volume13eng
source.identifier.eissn1933-169Xeng
source.identifier.issn1933-1681eng
source.periodicalTitleJournal of Information Technology & Politics : JITPeng

Dateien