From Technical to Aesthetics Quality Assessment and Beyond : Challenges and Potential
From Technical to Aesthetics Quality Assessment and Beyond : Challenges and Potential
Lade...
Datum
2020
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
eISSN
item.preview.dc.identifier.isbn
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
EU-Projektnummer
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Konferenzband
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
ATQAM/MAST'20: Joint Workshop on Aesthetic and Technical Quality Assessment of Multimedia and Media Analytics for Societal Trends / Hosu, Vlad et al. (Hrsg.). - New York : ACM, 2020. - S. 19-20. - ISBN 978-1-4503-8154-3
Zusammenfassung
Every day 1.8+ billion images are being uploaded to Facebook, Instagram, Flickr, Snapchat, and WhatsApp [6]. The exponential growth of visual media has made quality assessment become increasingly important for various applications, from image acquisition, synthesis, restoration, and enhancement, to image search and retrieval, storage, and recognition. There have been two related but different classes of visual quality assessment techniques: image quality assessment (IQA) and image aesthetics assessment (IAA). As perceptual assessment tasks, subjective IQA and IAA share some common underlying factors that affect user judgments. Moreover, they are similar in methodology (especially NR-IQA in-the-wild and IAA). However, the emphasis for each is different: IQA focuses on low-level defects e.g. processing artefacts, noise, and blur, while IAA puts more emphasis on abstract and higher-level concepts that capture the subjective aesthetics experience, e.g. established photographic rules encompassing lighting, composition, and colors, and personalized factors such as personality, cultural background, age, and emotion. IQA has been studied extensively over the last decades [3, 14, 22]. There are three main types of IQA methods: full-reference (FR), reduced-reference (RR), and no-reference (NR). Among these, NRIQA is the most challenging as it does not depend on reference images or impose strict assumptions on the distortion types and level. NR-IQA techniques can be further divided into those that predict the global image score [1, 2, 10, 17, 26] and patch-based IQA [23, 25], naming a few of the more recent approaches.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
004 Informatik
Schlagwörter
image quality assessment, image aesthetics assessment, IQA, IAA, potential, challenges
Konferenz
MM '20: The 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 12. Okt. 2020 - 16. Okt. 2020, Seattle
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Zitieren
ISO 690
HOSU, Vlad, Dietmar SAUPE, Bastian GOLDLÜCKE, Weisi LIN, Wen-Huang CHENG, John SEE, Lai-Kuan WONG, 2020. From Technical to Aesthetics Quality Assessment and Beyond : Challenges and Potential. MM '20: The 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. Seattle, 12. Okt. 2020 - 16. Okt. 2020. In: HOSU, Vlad, ed. and others. ATQAM/MAST'20: Joint Workshop on Aesthetic and Technical Quality Assessment of Multimedia and Media Analytics for Societal Trends. New York:ACM, pp. 19-20. ISBN 978-1-4503-8154-3. Available under: doi: 10.1145/3423268.3423589BibTex
@inproceedings{Hosu2020Techn-51421, year={2020}, doi={10.1145/3423268.3423589}, title={From Technical to Aesthetics Quality Assessment and Beyond : Challenges and Potential}, isbn={978-1-4503-8154-3}, publisher={ACM}, address={New York}, booktitle={ATQAM/MAST'20: Joint Workshop on Aesthetic and Technical Quality Assessment of Multimedia and Media Analytics for Societal Trends}, pages={19--20}, editor={Hosu, Vlad}, author={Hosu, Vlad and Saupe, Dietmar and Goldlücke, Bastian and Lin, Weisi and Cheng, Wen-Huang and See, John and Wong, Lai-Kuan} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/51421"> <dc:creator>Hosu, Vlad</dc:creator> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/51421/1/Hosu_2-3gz5dg09sllp3.pdf"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/> <dc:creator>Saupe, Dietmar</dc:creator> <dc:creator>See, John</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Saupe, Dietmar</dc:contributor> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:contributor>See, John</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Wong, Lai-Kuan</dc:contributor> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/51421/1/Hosu_2-3gz5dg09sllp3.pdf"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:issued>2020</dcterms:issued> <dc:creator>Wong, Lai-Kuan</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Goldlücke, Bastian</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Goldlücke, Bastian</dc:creator> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:creator>Cheng, Wen-Huang</dc:creator> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/> <dc:contributor>Cheng, Wen-Huang</dc:contributor> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-10-19T13:37:22Z</dc:date> <dcterms:title>From Technical to Aesthetics Quality Assessment and Beyond : Challenges and Potential</dcterms:title> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/51421"/> <dc:contributor>Lin, Weisi</dc:contributor> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-10-19T13:37:22Z</dcterms:available> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Every day 1.8+ billion images are being uploaded to Facebook, Instagram, Flickr, Snapchat, and WhatsApp [6]. The exponential growth of visual media has made quality assessment become increasingly important for various applications, from image acquisition, synthesis, restoration, and enhancement, to image search and retrieval, storage, and recognition. There have been two related but different classes of visual quality assessment techniques: image quality assessment (IQA) and image aesthetics assessment (IAA). As perceptual assessment tasks, subjective IQA and IAA share some common underlying factors that affect user judgments. Moreover, they are similar in methodology (especially NR-IQA in-the-wild and IAA). However, the emphasis for each is different: IQA focuses on low-level defects e.g. processing artefacts, noise, and blur, while IAA puts more emphasis on abstract and higher-level concepts that capture the subjective aesthetics experience, e.g. established photographic rules encompassing lighting, composition, and colors, and personalized factors such as personality, cultural background, age, and emotion. IQA has been studied extensively over the last decades [3, 14, 22]. There are three main types of IQA methods: full-reference (FR), reduced-reference (RR), and no-reference (NR). Among these, NRIQA is the most challenging as it does not depend on reference images or impose strict assumptions on the distortion types and level. NR-IQA techniques can be further divided into those that predict the global image score [1, 2, 10, 17, 26] and patch-based IQA [23, 25], naming a few of the more recent approaches.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Lin, Weisi</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Hosu, Vlad</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja