Publikation:

Simplicity and elegance in Millikan’s account of productivity : reply to Martinez

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2016

Autor:innen

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Philosophical Psychology. 2016, 29(4), pp. 503-516. ISSN 0951-5089. eISSN 1465-394X. Available under: doi: 10.1080/09515089.2015.1085006

Zusammenfassung

This paper responds to a problem, raised by Martinez (2013), for Millikan's explanation of the interpretability of novel signs in terms of mapping functions. I argue that Martinez's critique is a logically weakened (and hence more difficult to refute) version of Kripke's skeptical argument about rule following. Responding to Martinez requires two things. First, we must correctly understand the role of simplicity and elegance in choosing the correct mapping function for a signaling system. Second, we need to understand that mapping functions are descriptions of the features that determine the content of signs; they do not themselves determine the content of signs. Bearing these facts in mind, Martinez's concern is assuaged. However, we find that this position on the role of mapping functions is not fully consistent with Millikan's (1990) response to Kripke. I modify her response to Kripke and demonstrate that the alterations do not undermine her view.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
400 Sprachwissenschaft, Linguistik

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Verknüpfte Datensätze

Zitieren

ISO 690LEAHY, Brian, 2016. Simplicity and elegance in Millikan’s account of productivity : reply to Martinez. In: Philosophical Psychology. 2016, 29(4), pp. 503-516. ISSN 0951-5089. eISSN 1465-394X. Available under: doi: 10.1080/09515089.2015.1085006
BibTex
@article{Leahy2016Simpl-34931,
  year={2016},
  doi={10.1080/09515089.2015.1085006},
  title={Simplicity and elegance in Millikan’s account of productivity : reply to Martinez},
  number={4},
  volume={29},
  issn={0951-5089},
  journal={Philosophical Psychology},
  pages={503--516},
  author={Leahy, Brian}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34931">
    <dcterms:title>Simplicity and elegance in Millikan’s account of productivity : reply to Martinez</dcterms:title>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/34931"/>
    <dc:creator>Leahy, Brian</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-08-03T14:45:23Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This paper responds to a problem, raised by Martinez (2013), for Millikan's explanation of the interpretability of novel signs in terms of mapping functions. I argue that Martinez's critique is a logically weakened (and hence more difficult to refute) version of Kripke's skeptical argument about rule following. Responding to Martinez requires two things. First, we must correctly understand the role of simplicity and elegance in choosing the correct mapping function for a signaling system. Second, we need to understand that mapping functions are descriptions of the features that determine the content of signs; they do not themselves determine the content of signs. Bearing these facts in mind, Martinez's concern is assuaged. However, we find that this position on the role of mapping functions is not fully consistent with Millikan's (1990) response to Kripke. I modify her response to Kripke and demonstrate that the alterations do not undermine her view.</dcterms:abstract>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2016</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-08-03T14:45:23Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Leahy, Brian</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen