The Mismatch Problem : Why Mele's Approach to the Puzzle of Synchronic Self‐control Does Not Succeed

dc.contributor.authorAltehenger, Hannah
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-08T10:02:50Z
dc.date.available2022-09-08T10:02:50Z
dc.date.issued2021eng
dc.description.abstractMost of us have had the experience of resisting our currently strongest desire, for example, resisting the desire to eat another cookie when eating another cookie is what we most want to do. The puzzle of synchronic self-control, however, says that this is impossible: an agent cannot ever resist her currently strongest desire. The paper argues that one prominent solution to this puzzle – the solution offered by Al Mele – faces a serious ‘mismatch problem’, which ultimately undermines its plausibility. It is furthermore argued that this problem can be avoided if we adopt a ‘divided mind’ solution instead.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedeng
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/papq.12344eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/58551
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsterms-of-use
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/
dc.subject.ddc100eng
dc.titleThe Mismatch Problem : Why Mele's Approach to the Puzzle of Synchronic Self‐control Does Not Succeedeng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEeng
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Altehenger2021Misma-58551,
  year={2021},
  doi={10.1111/papq.12344},
  title={The Mismatch Problem : Why Mele's Approach to the Puzzle of Synchronic Self‐control Does Not Succeed},
  number={2},
  volume={102},
  issn={0279-0750},
  journal={Pacific Philosophical Quarterly},
  pages={243--266},
  author={Altehenger, Hannah}
}
kops.citation.iso690ALTEHENGER, Hannah, 2021. The Mismatch Problem : Why Mele's Approach to the Puzzle of Synchronic Self‐control Does Not Succeed. In: Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. Wiley-Blackwell - SSH. 2021, 102(2), pp. 243-266. ISSN 0279-0750. eISSN 1468-0114. Available under: doi: 10.1111/papq.12344deu
kops.citation.iso690ALTEHENGER, Hannah, 2021. The Mismatch Problem : Why Mele's Approach to the Puzzle of Synchronic Self‐control Does Not Succeed. In: Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. Wiley-Blackwell - SSH. 2021, 102(2), pp. 243-266. ISSN 0279-0750. eISSN 1468-0114. Available under: doi: 10.1111/papq.12344eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/58551">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Altehenger, Hannah</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2021</dcterms:issued>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:title>The Mismatch Problem : Why Mele's Approach to the Puzzle of Synchronic Self‐control Does Not Succeed</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Most of us have had the experience of resisting our currently strongest desire, for example, resisting the desire to eat another cookie when eating another cookie is what we most want to do. The puzzle of synchronic self-control, however, says that this is impossible: an agent cannot ever resist her currently strongest desire. The paper argues that one prominent solution to this puzzle – the solution offered by Al Mele – faces a serious ‘mismatch problem’, which ultimately undermines its plausibility. It is furthermore argued that this problem can be avoided if we adopt a ‘divided mind’ solution instead.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-09-08T10:02:50Z</dcterms:available>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/58551"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-09-08T10:02:50Z</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dc:creator>Altehenger, Hannah</dc:creator>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.flag.isPeerReviewedtrueeng
kops.flag.knbibliographyfalse
kops.sourcefieldPacific Philosophical Quarterly. Wiley-Blackwell - SSH. 2021, <b>102</b>(2), pp. 243-266. ISSN 0279-0750. eISSN 1468-0114. Available under: doi: 10.1111/papq.12344deu
kops.sourcefield.plainPacific Philosophical Quarterly. Wiley-Blackwell - SSH. 2021, 102(2), pp. 243-266. ISSN 0279-0750. eISSN 1468-0114. Available under: doi: 10.1111/papq.12344deu
kops.sourcefield.plainPacific Philosophical Quarterly. Wiley-Blackwell - SSH. 2021, 102(2), pp. 243-266. ISSN 0279-0750. eISSN 1468-0114. Available under: doi: 10.1111/papq.12344eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationbebdd2f1-17c0-413f-913e-ada04a32a5ab
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverybebdd2f1-17c0-413f-913e-ada04a32a5ab
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage243eng
source.bibliographicInfo.issue2eng
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage266eng
source.bibliographicInfo.volume102eng
source.identifier.eissn1468-0114eng
source.identifier.issn0279-0750eng
source.periodicalTitlePacific Philosophical Quarterlyeng
source.publisherWiley-Blackwell - SSHeng

Dateien