Publikation: A Generalization of the Reflection Principle
Lade...
Dateien
Datum
2023
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Gold
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Dialectica. European Society of Analytic Philosophy. 2023, 77(1), S. 73-96. ISSN 0012-2017. eISSN 1746-8361. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.48106/dial.v77.i1.04
Zusammenfassung
This paper generalizes (probabilistic) auto-epistemology by amending the original forward-looking reflection principle of van Fraassen [-@vanfraassen:1984], which is about learning or favorable epistemic changes in general, by a new but similar backward-looking principle, which is about forgetting and other unfavorable epistemic changes. The generalization is argued to be a completion by defending what is called the no-neutrality condition. Due to the similarity, analogous consequences are provable for both principles. This fact is utilized for a plausibility check of the new principle. Finally, it is argued that this generalization should not be considered as a special case of the expert principle.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
SPOHN, Wolfgang, 2023. A Generalization of the Reflection Principle. In: Dialectica. European Society of Analytic Philosophy. 2023, 77(1), S. 73-96. ISSN 0012-2017. eISSN 1746-8361. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.48106/dial.v77.i1.04BibTex
@article{Spohn2023Gener-75936,
title={A Generalization of the Reflection Principle},
year={2023},
doi={10.48106/dial.v77.i1.04},
number={1},
volume={77},
issn={0012-2017},
journal={Dialectica},
pages={73--96},
author={Spohn, Wolfgang}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/75936">
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2026-01-27T15:31:23Z</dc:date>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2026-01-27T15:31:23Z</dcterms:available>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<dcterms:issued>2023</dcterms:issued>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/75936"/>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/75936/1/Spohn_2-fm7a7fa7mt75.pdf"/>
<dc:creator>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:creator>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:contributor>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:title>A Generalization of the Reflection Principle</dcterms:title>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/75936/1/Spohn_2-fm7a7fa7mt75.pdf"/>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:abstract>This paper generalizes (probabilistic) auto-epistemology by amending the original forward-looking reflection principle of van Fraassen [-@vanfraassen:1984], which is about learning or favorable epistemic changes in general, by a new but similar backward-looking principle, which is about forgetting and other unfavorable epistemic changes. The generalization is argued to be a completion by defending what is called the no-neutrality condition. Due to the similarity, analogous consequences are provable for both principles. This fact is utilized for a plausibility check of the new principle. Finally, it is argued that this generalization should not be considered as a special case of the expert principle.</dcterms:abstract>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
