Datensatz: Replication Data for: Deontological and consequentialist preferences towards arms exports: A comparative conjoint experiment in France and Germany
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung
Autor:innen
Andere Beitragende
Repositorium der Erstveröffentlichung
Version des Datensatzes
DOI (Link zu den Daten)
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationsstatus
Zusammenfassung
Despite fierce politicization in arms-exporting democracies, we lack systematic research on mass public preferences on arms transfers. We propose that citizens either apply a deontologist (rejecting transfers categorically) or consequentialist (trading-off economic, strategic and normative aspects) calculus of preference formation. Conducting population-representative survey experiments (N=6,617) in Germany and France, two global top-5 major arms exporters, we find that 10-15% of respondents follow deontologist considerations, a preference structure potentially relevant for all foreign policies involving the use of military force. Still, a majority shows differentiated preferences, giving largest weight to normative considerations, with assessments affected by moderating features (e.g., scenarios of just war). Principled rejection of arms trade and a large consequentialist weight for normative factors are more pronounced in Germany compared to France, indicating that public opinion might pose a stronger constraint in this country. Respondents' preferences match opinion-polls on post-Russian invasion Ukraine-armament, indicating high external validity of our experiments.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Zitieren
ISO 690
RUDOLPH, Lukas, Markus FREITAG, Paul THURNER, 2023. Replication Data for: Deontological and consequentialist preferences towards arms exports: A comparative conjoint experiment in France and GermanyBibTex
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/72053"> <dcterms:title>Replication Data for: Deontological and consequentialist preferences towards arms exports: A comparative conjoint experiment in France and Germany</dcterms:title> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71935"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-01-27T12:47:59Z</dc:date> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:issued>2023</dcterms:issued> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71935"/> <dc:contributor>Rudolph, Lukas</dc:contributor> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-01-27T12:47:59Z</dcterms:available> <dc:rights>Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal</dc:rights> <dc:contributor>Thurner, Paul</dc:contributor> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:creator>Rudolph, Lukas</dc:creator> <dcterms:created rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-05-19T08:40:16.000Z</dcterms:created> <dc:creator>Thurner, Paul</dc:creator> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:abstract>Despite fierce politicization in arms-exporting democracies, we lack systematic research on mass public preferences on arms transfers. We propose that citizens either apply a deontologist (rejecting transfers categorically) or consequentialist (trading-off economic, strategic and normative aspects) calculus of preference formation. Conducting population-representative survey experiments (N=6,617) in Germany and France, two global top-5 major arms exporters, we find that 10-15% of respondents follow deontologist considerations, a preference structure potentially relevant for all foreign policies involving the use of military force. Still, a majority shows differentiated preferences, giving largest weight to normative considerations, with assessments affected by moderating features (e.g., scenarios of just war). Principled rejection of arms trade and a large consequentialist weight for normative factors are more pronounced in Germany compared to France, indicating that public opinion might pose a stronger constraint in this country. Respondents' preferences match opinion-polls on post-Russian invasion Ukraine-armament, indicating high external validity of our experiments.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Freitag, Markus</dc:creator> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/72053"/> <dc:contributor>Freitag, Markus</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>