Datensatz: Replication Data for: "Civil Liberties or Economic Freedom? : The Political Space of Internet Policy in the European Parliament, 1999 - 2014"
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung
Autor:innen
Andere Beitragende
Repositorium der Erstveröffentlichung
Version des Datensatzes
DOI (Link zu den Daten)
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationsstatus
Zusammenfassung
The Internet has become central to economic exchange and political communication, placing regulatory initiatives high on European policy agendas. What cleavages shape the political conflicts surrounding Internet policy? I argue that proposals to regulate the Internet frequently affect not only economic interests but also the civil liberties of citizens in the online environment. Political parties must therefore balance their stance on market regulation and their socio-cultural preferences on the “liberal-authoritarian” dimension of political contestation. To explore party competition on Internet policy in the European Union, I analyse all Internet policy roll-call votes in the European Parliament from 1999 to 2014. Ideal point estimation shows that political competition in this policy field is best explained by the “liberal-authoritarian” dimension. Reinforcing this finding, two case studies illustrate how civil liberty concerns motivate left-wing parties and the liberal party group to form voting coalitions despite diverging economic preferences.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Zitieren
ISO 690
HEERMANN, Max, 2023. Replication Data for: "Civil Liberties or Economic Freedom? : The Political Space of Internet Policy in the European Parliament, 1999 - 2014"BibTex
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/73077"> <dcterms:created rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-01-20T15:44:22Z</dcterms:created> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-04-17T08:04:40Z</dcterms:available> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:title>Replication Data for: "Civil Liberties or Economic Freedom? : The Political Space of Internet Policy in the European Parliament, 1999 - 2014"</dcterms:title> <dc:creator>Heermann, Max</dc:creator> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:rights>Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal</dc:rights> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71935"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71935"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/73077"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode"/> <dc:contributor>Heermann, Max</dc:contributor> <dcterms:abstract>The Internet has become central to economic exchange and political communication, placing regulatory initiatives high on European policy agendas. What cleavages shape the political conflicts surrounding Internet policy? I argue that proposals to regulate the Internet frequently affect not only economic interests but also the civil liberties of citizens in the online environment. Political parties must therefore balance their stance on market regulation and their socio-cultural preferences on the “liberal-authoritarian” dimension of political contestation. To explore party competition on Internet policy in the European Union, I analyse all Internet policy roll-call votes in the European Parliament from 1999 to 2014. Ideal point estimation shows that political competition in this policy field is best explained by the “liberal-authoritarian” dimension. Reinforcing this finding, two case studies illustrate how civil liberty concerns motivate left-wing parties and the liberal party group to form voting coalitions despite diverging economic preferences.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:issued>2023</dcterms:issued> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-04-17T08:04:40Z</dc:date> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>