Publikation: A limitation of the Cognitive Reflection Test : familiarity
Lade...
Dateien
Datum
2016
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Gold
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
PeerJ. 2016, 4, e2395. eISSN 2167-8359. Available under: doi: 10.7717/peerj.2395
Zusammenfassung
The Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT; Frederick, 2005) is a frequently used measure of cognitive vs. intuitive reflection. It is also a frequently found entertaining 'test' on the Internet. In a large age-stratified community-based sample (N = 2,272), we analyzed the impact of having already performed the CRT or any similar task in the past. Indeed, we found that 44% of participants had experiences with these tasks, which was reflected in higher CRT scores (Cohen's d = 0.41). Furthermore, experienced participants were different from naïve participants in regard to their socio-demographics (younger, higher educated, fewer siblings, more likely single or in a relationship than married, having no children). The best predictors of a high CRT score were the highest educational qualification (4.62% explained variance) followed by the experience with the task (3.06%). Therefore, we suggest using more recent multi-item CRTs with newer items and a more elaborated test construction.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
STIEGER, Stefan, Ulf-Dietrich REIPS, 2016. A limitation of the Cognitive Reflection Test : familiarity. In: PeerJ. 2016, 4, e2395. eISSN 2167-8359. Available under: doi: 10.7717/peerj.2395BibTex
@article{Stieger2016limit-37091,
year={2016},
doi={10.7717/peerj.2395},
title={A limitation of the Cognitive Reflection Test : familiarity},
volume={4},
journal={PeerJ},
author={Stieger, Stefan and Reips, Ulf-Dietrich},
note={Article Number: e2395}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/37091">
<dcterms:issued>2016</dcterms:issued>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/37091"/>
<dc:contributor>Reips, Ulf-Dietrich</dc:contributor>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
<dc:contributor>Stieger, Stefan</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-02-03T10:51:29Z</dcterms:available>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/37091/5/Stieger_0-365945.pdf"/>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:creator>Stieger, Stefan</dc:creator>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT; Frederick, 2005) is a frequently used measure of cognitive vs. intuitive reflection. It is also a frequently found entertaining 'test' on the Internet. In a large age-stratified community-based sample (N = 2,272), we analyzed the impact of having already performed the CRT or any similar task in the past. Indeed, we found that 44% of participants had experiences with these tasks, which was reflected in higher CRT scores (Cohen's d = 0.41). Furthermore, experienced participants were different from naïve participants in regard to their socio-demographics (younger, higher educated, fewer siblings, more likely single or in a relationship than married, having no children). The best predictors of a high CRT score were the highest educational qualification (4.62% explained variance) followed by the experience with the task (3.06%). Therefore, we suggest using more recent multi-item CRTs with newer items and a more elaborated test construction.</dcterms:abstract>
<dcterms:title>A limitation of the Cognitive Reflection Test : familiarity</dcterms:title>
<dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-02-03T10:51:29Z</dc:date>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/37091/5/Stieger_0-365945.pdf"/>
<dc:creator>Reips, Ulf-Dietrich</dc:creator>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Versionsgeschichte
You are currently viewing version 1 of the item.