Evidential meaning and (not-)at-issueness

Cite This

Files in this item

Checksum: MD5:ceff04d0ef7910fd2834a8a5d9812026

KOROTKOVA, Natalia, 2020. Evidential meaning and (not-)at-issueness. In: Semantics and Pragmatics. Linguistic Society of America. 13, 4. eISSN 1937-8912. Available under: doi: 10.3765/sp.13.4

@article{Korotkova2020Evide-59376, title={Evidential meaning and (not-)at-issueness}, year={2020}, doi={10.3765/sp.13.4}, volume={13}, journal={Semantics and Pragmatics}, author={Korotkova, Natalia}, note={Article Number: 4} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/59376"> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/59376/1/Korotkova_2-1qx9abj7np13o9.pdf"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/59376"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/59376/1/Korotkova_2-1qx9abj7np13o9.pdf"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Recent years have seen a lot of research on evidentiality within formal semantics and pragmatics. The near-consensus in the literature is that the type of evidence signalled by the evidential marker, which I will refer to as the Evidential Requirement (ER), is not asserted and should be analyzed as a conventional trigger of Not-At-Issue (NAI) content. By scrutinizing empirical diagnostics previously used to support the ER-as-NAI view, the paper aims at disentangling how different notions of (not-)at-issueness can be applied to evidentiality, and develops objections to the idea that evidentials always conventionally encode NAI content.</dcterms:abstract> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-12-02T08:29:36Z</dcterms:available> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-12-02T08:29:36Z</dc:date> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dcterms:issued>2020</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:creator>Korotkova, Natalia</dc:creator> <dcterms:title>Evidential meaning and (not-)at-issueness</dcterms:title> <dc:contributor>Korotkova, Natalia</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Downloads since Dec 2, 2022 (Information about access statistics)

Korotkova_2-1qx9abj7np13o9.pdf 28

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


Browse

My Account