Drive, Will, and Reason : Reinhold and Schiller on Realizing Freedom after Kant

Noller, Jörg

Drive, Will, and Reason : Reinhold and Schiller on Realizing Freedom after Kant

Files

There are no files associated with this item.

Date

2022

Publication type

Contribution to a collection

Publication status

Published

Published in

The Concept of Drive in Classical German Philosophy : Between Biology, Anthropology, and Metaphysics / Kisner, Manja; Noller, Jörg (ed.). - Cham : Palgrave Macmillan, 2022. - pp. 241-254. - ISBN 978-3-030-84159-1

Abstract

Karl Leonhard Reinhold’s and Friedrich Schiller’s conception of drive can be interpreted as a systematic response to an ambivalence in Kant’s conception of drive and driving force, which he associates with heteronomy and autonomy. Reinhold distinguishes between a selfish (“eigennütziger”) and an unselfish (“uneigennütziger”) drive. In doing so, he revaluates the drive as something that is compatible with our freedom of the will. Both drives are the vital basis of our free decision and therefore united. Schiller distinguishes between three kinds of drive. The object of the form-drive (“Formtrieb”) is the Gestalt of the world, its intelligible structure and necessity, whereas the object of the material drive (“Stofftrieb”) is the human life and its sensual reality. In opposition to Reinhold, Schiller introduces a third drive that he calls the “play drive” (“Spieltrieb”). However, it is not an instance additional to the material and form-drive, but rather designates the harmony of both drives.

Subject (DDC)

100 Philosophy

Cite This

ISO 690

NOLLER, Jörg, 2022. Drive, Will, and Reason : Reinhold and Schiller on Realizing Freedom after Kant. In: KISNER, Manja, ed., Jörg NOLLER, ed.. The Concept of Drive in Classical German Philosophy : Between Biology, Anthropology, and Metaphysics. Cham:Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 241-254. ISBN 978-3-030-84159-1. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-84160-7_12

BibTex

@incollection{Noller2022Drive-58243,
  year={2022},
  doi={10.1007/978-3-030-84160-7_12},
  title={Drive, Will, and Reason : Reinhold and Schiller on Realizing Freedom after Kant},
  isbn={978-3-030-84159-1},
  publisher={Palgrave Macmillan},
  address={Cham},
  booktitle={The Concept of Drive in Classical German Philosophy : Between Biology, Anthropology, and Metaphysics},
  pages={241--254},
  editor={Kisner, Manja and Noller, Jörg},
  author={Noller, Jörg}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/58243">
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:title>Drive, Will, and Reason : Reinhold and Schiller on Realizing Freedom after Kant</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Karl Leonhard Reinhold’s and Friedrich Schiller’s conception of drive can be interpreted as a systematic response to an ambivalence in Kant’s conception of drive and driving force, which he associates with heteronomy and autonomy. Reinhold distinguishes between a selfish (“eigennütziger”) and an unselfish (“uneigennütziger”) drive. In doing so, he revaluates the drive as something that is compatible with our freedom of the will. Both drives are the vital basis of our free decision and therefore united. Schiller distinguishes between three kinds of drive. The object of the form-drive (“Formtrieb”) is the Gestalt of the world, its intelligible structure and necessity, whereas the object of the material drive (“Stofftrieb”) is the human life and its sensual reality. In opposition to Reinhold, Schiller introduces a third drive that he calls the “play drive” (“Spieltrieb”). However, it is not an instance additional to the material and form-drive, but rather designates the harmony of both drives.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-08-05T12:28:33Z</dc:date>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:creator>Noller, Jörg</dc:creator>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/58243"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-08-05T12:28:33Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:issued>2022</dcterms:issued>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Noller, Jörg</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Bibliography of Konstanz

Yes