'Believe' is Strong but Subjective : Experimental Evidence from Hedging

Cite This

Files in this item

Checksum: MD5:185345f99179388d23dadcfb2daa09d8

KOEV, Todor, Cory BILL, Maryam MOHAMMADI, 2021. 'Believe' is Strong but Subjective : Experimental Evidence from Hedging. Sinn und Bedeutung 25. London, Sep 3, 2020 - Sep 9, 2020. In: GROSZ, Patrick, ed. and others. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 25. Konstanz:University of Konstanz, pp. 480-497. eISSN 2629-6055. Available under: doi: 10.18148/sub/2021.v25i0.950

@inproceedings{Koev2021Belie-57904, title={'Believe' is Strong but Subjective : Experimental Evidence from Hedging}, year={2021}, doi={10.18148/sub/2021.v25i0.950}, address={Konstanz}, publisher={University of Konstanz}, booktitle={Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 25}, pages={480--497}, editor={Grosz, Patrick}, author={Koev, Todor and Bill, Cory and Mohammadi, Maryam} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/57904"> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:creator>Bill, Cory</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Mohammadi, Maryam</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Mohammadi, Maryam</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Koev, Todor</dc:creator> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dcterms:issued>2021</dcterms:issued> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/57904/1/Koev_2-equuiqx8rq33.pdf"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/57904"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/57904/1/Koev_2-equuiqx8rq33.pdf"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dcterms:title>'Believe' is Strong but Subjective : Experimental Evidence from Hedging</dcterms:title> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:contributor>Bill, Cory</dc:contributor> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-06-30T12:36:27Z</dc:date> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-06-30T12:36:27Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This paper contributes to the debate concerning whether the attitude verb believe has a weak or a strong semantics. According to Hawthorne et al. (2016), believe is weak and akin to the probability operator likely, typically receiving an “agent finds it more likely than not” interpretation. Alternatively, Koev (2019) proposes that believe conveys high certainty but qualifies this certainty as subjective or lacking evidence, in contrast with modals that convey high objective certainty, like sure (see also Lyons 1977; Kratzer 1981; Nuyts 2001; Papafragou 2006; Portner 2009). We focus on the use of believe as a hedge (e.g. I believe the Giants will win, but I’m not sure they will) as allegedly the most convincing argument for the weak view, and argue that, in fact, it favors the strong-but-subjective view. We show experimentally that the availability of the hedging use of believe is affected by certain grammatical and discourse factors. Experiment 1 reveals that participants rate hedging sentences with combinations of third person/past tense/embedded features as less natural than canonical first person/present tense/main clause forms. In turn, Experiment 2 reveals that hedging sentences with at-issue prejacents are judged as more natural than sentences in which the belief component is at-issue. The observed variability posits a challenge to the weak view, which establishes a purely logical contrast in modal strength between likelihood vs. certainty. However, it is in line with the strong-but-subjective view, which establishes a contrast in modal content between certainty without evidence vs. certainty with evidence and predicts a more restricted distribution of the hedging reading.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dc:contributor>Koev, Todor</dc:contributor> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Downloads since Jun 30, 2022 (Information about access statistics)

Koev_2-equuiqx8rq33.pdf 25

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


Browse

My Account