KOPS - The Institutional Repository of the University of Konstanz

Kontinentales Erbe Und Analytische Methode : Nelson Goodman Und Die Tradition

Kontinentales Erbe Und Analytische Methode : Nelson Goodman Und Die Tradition

Cite This

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

GABRIEL, Gottfried, 2000. Kontinentales Erbe Und Analytische Methode : Nelson Goodman Und Die Tradition. In: Erkenntnis. Springer Science+Business Media B.V.. 52(2), pp. 185-198. ISSN 1876-2530. eISSN 1572-8420. Available under: doi: 10.1023/A:1005557524926

@article{Gabriel2000Konti-57486, title={Kontinentales Erbe Und Analytische Methode : Nelson Goodman Und Die Tradition}, year={2000}, doi={10.1023/A:1005557524926}, number={2}, volume={52}, issn={1876-2530}, journal={Erkenntnis}, pages={185--198}, author={Gabriel, Gottfried} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/57486"> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dc:creator>Gabriel, Gottfried</dc:creator> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dcterms:title>Kontinentales Erbe Und Analytische Methode : Nelson Goodman Und Die Tradition</dcterms:title> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dc:contributor>Gabriel, Gottfried</dc:contributor> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/57486"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dcterms:issued>2000</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="deu">Goodman's most important contribution to philosophy seems to be his analysis of the relation between facts of science and fictions of art. His view can be seen as a kind of complementary pluralism. That is to say, science and art are two complementary forms of achieving cognition. This position overcame the positivistic view (of his teacher Carnap) according to which the value of art is restricted to the non-cognitive function of expressing emotions. In this paper I compare some of Goodman's fundamental ideas – especially his central conception of exemplification – with their counterparts in Baumgarten, Kant, and Cassirer. Based on this comparison I argue against the tendency to regard analytic and continental philosophy as two completely separated traditions.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-05-10T10:07:36Z</dc:date> <dc:language>deu</dc:language> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-05-10T10:07:36Z</dcterms:available> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


Browse

My Account