KOPS - The Institutional Repository of the University of Konstanz

Truth, Value, and Truth Value : Frege’s Theory of Judgement and its Historical Background

Truth, Value, and Truth Value : Frege’s Theory of Judgement and its Historical Background

Cite This

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

GABRIEL, Gottfried, 2013. Truth, Value, and Truth Value : Frege’s Theory of Judgement and its Historical Background. In: TEXTOR, Mark, ed.. Judgement and Truth in Early Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology. London:Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 36-51. ISBN 978-1-349-44929-3. Available under: doi: 10.1057/9781137286338_3

@incollection{Gabriel2013Truth-56836, title={Truth, Value, and Truth Value : Frege’s Theory of Judgement and its Historical Background}, year={2013}, doi={10.1057/9781137286338_3}, isbn={978-1-349-44929-3}, address={London}, publisher={Palgrave Macmillan}, booktitle={Judgement and Truth in Early Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology}, pages={36--51}, editor={Textor, Mark}, author={Gabriel, Gottfried} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/56836"> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dc:creator>Gabriel, Gottfried</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2013</dcterms:issued> <dc:contributor>Gabriel, Gottfried</dc:contributor> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-03-11T12:32:01Z</dc:date> <dcterms:title>Truth, Value, and Truth Value : Frege’s Theory of Judgement and its Historical Background</dcterms:title> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-03-11T12:32:01Z</dcterms:available> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/56836"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In Frege’s theory of judgement, the concept of truth is closely connected with the concept of assertoric force — a connection which justifies us in speaking of a (truth) theory of acknowledgement (Anerkennung). Frege is well aware of the paradoxical nature of his attempts to explicate his views (i.e. to express them in language). The paradox arises because we are concerned here with saying what cannot be (logically) said. Frege thus anticipates Wittgenstein’s view that the categorial discourse in philosophy does not consist of sentences with a truth value, but rather of ‘elucidations’. Two things are central to Frege’s theory of acknowledgement: first, the distinction between the act of judging (pragmatically expressed through the judgement stroke) and the content of judgement; and second, the value-theoretic understanding of the notion of truth values. It will be shown that in developing his own logic, Frege was inspired by traditional logic, and by the Southwest School of Neo-Kantianism in particular.</dcterms:abstract> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


Browse

My Account