Friendly fire? : Negative campaigning among coalition partners

Haselmayer, Martin; Jenny, Marcelo

Friendly fire? : Negative campaigning among coalition partners

Dateien

Haselmayer_2-1nnyakaconi43.pdfGröße: 504.25 KBDownloads: 84

Datum

2018

Autor:innen

Haselmayer, Martin

Jenny, Marcelo

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

Research & Politics. Sage Publications. 2018, 5(3), pp. 1-9. eISSN 2053-1680. Available under: doi: 10.1177/2053168018796911

Zusammenfassung

In democracies with multi-party competition, government parties face a dual challenge in election campaigns: on the one hand, they have to compete against and criticize their coalition partners. On the other hand, they should avoid virulent attacks on their partners to preserve their chances of future collaboration in government. Going beyond a dichotomous operationalization of negative campaigning, this manuscript analyses the tonality and volume of negative campaigning. Studying 3030 party press releases in four national Austrian election campaigns, different patterns for the tonality and frequency of negative campaigning reflect the electoral dilemma of government parties. Coalition parties criticize each other abundantly but refrain from ‘burning bridges’ with their partners through virulent attacks. These findings have implications for studying negative campaigning and coalition politics.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

320 Politik

Schlagwörter

Negative campaigning, multi-party competition, government coalitions, political parties, crowdcoding, campaign tonality

Zitieren

ISO 690

HASELMAYER, Martin, Marcelo JENNY, 2018. Friendly fire? : Negative campaigning among coalition partners. In: Research & Politics. Sage Publications. 2018, 5(3), pp. 1-9. eISSN 2053-1680. Available under: doi: 10.1177/2053168018796911

BibTex

@article{Haselmayer2018Frien-56078,
  year={2018},
  doi={10.1177/2053168018796911},
  title={Friendly fire? : Negative campaigning among coalition partners},
  number={3},
  volume={5},
  journal={Research & Politics},
  pages={1--9},
  author={Haselmayer, Martin and Jenny, Marcelo}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/56078">
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-01-05T09:35:16Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:contributor>Jenny, Marcelo</dc:contributor>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:creator>Haselmayer, Martin</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-01-05T09:35:16Z</dcterms:available>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/56078/3/Haselmayer_2-1nnyakaconi43.pdf"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/56078"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/56078/3/Haselmayer_2-1nnyakaconi43.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Haselmayer, Martin</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Jenny, Marcelo</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2018</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In democracies with multi-party competition, government parties face a dual challenge in election campaigns: on the one hand, they have to compete against and criticize their coalition partners. On the other hand, they should avoid virulent attacks on their partners to preserve their chances of future collaboration in government. Going beyond a dichotomous operationalization of negative campaigning, this manuscript analyses the tonality and volume of negative campaigning. Studying 3030 party press releases in four national Austrian election campaigns, different patterns for the tonality and frequency of negative campaigning reflect the electoral dilemma of government parties. Coalition parties criticize each other abundantly but refrain from ‘burning bridges’ with their partners through virulent attacks. These findings have implications for studying negative campaigning and coalition politics.</dcterms:abstract>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:title>Friendly fire? : Negative campaigning among coalition partners</dcterms:title>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Nein

Begutachtet

Ja