Evaluation of the Matlab Simulink Design Verifier versus the model checker SPIN
Aufgrund von Vorbereitungen auf eine neue Version von KOPS, können derzeit keine Publikationen eingereicht werden. (Due to preparations for a new version of KOPS, no publications can be submitted currently.)
| Type of Publication: | Bachelor thesis |
| URI (citable link): | http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus-61257 |
| Author: | Leitner-Fischer, Florian |
| Year of publication: | 2008 |
| Summary: |
An increasing number of industrial strength software design tools come along with verification tools that offer some property checking capabilities. On the other hand, there is a large number of general purpose model checking tools available. The question whether users of the industrial strength design tool preferably use the built-in verification tool or a general purpose model checking tool arises quite naturally. In this bachelor thesis, the Simulink Design Verifier and the SPIN model checking tool are compared. The comparison is based on the case study of an AUTOSAR compliant memory management module. The comparison is both functional in that it analyzes the suitability to verify a set of basic system properties, and quantitative in comparing the computational efficiency of both tools. In this context, it is also described how Simulink / Stateflow models can be manually translated into the input language of the model checker SPIN.
|
| Summary in another language: |
Eine steigende Anzahl von industriell eingesetzten Software Design Werkzeugen, bietet Möglichkeiten "Korrektheitseigenschaften" zu verifizieren. Andererseits, gibt es eine große Anzahl an allgemeinen Model Checking Werkzeugen. Natürlich stellt sich nun die Frage, ob der Benutzer eines industriellen Software Design Werkzeuges nun das eingebaute Verifizierungs-Werkzeug benutzen sollte, oder ob er eines der allgemeinen Model Checking Werkzeuge bevorzugen sollte. In dieser Bachelorarbeit wird der Simulink Design Verifier mit dem model checking Werkzeug SPIN verglichen. Dem Vergleich liegt die Fallstudie eines AUTOSAR kompatiblen Speicherverwaltungs-Modul zu Grunde. Der Vergleich ist sowohl funktional, da analysiert wird, inwieweit sich die Werkzeuge dazu eignen eine ausgewählte Menge an "Korrektheitseigenschaften" zu verifizieren, als auch quantitativ da die Effizienz der beiden Werkzeuge verglichen wird. Im Zusammenhang wird auch beschrieben, wie Simulink / Stateflow Modelle manuell in die Eingabesprache des Model Checker SPIN übersetzt werden können.
|
| CCS Classification: | D.2.4 |
| Subject (DDC): | 004 Computer Science |
| Keywords: | Zustandsraum Exploration, Matlab Simulink, SPIN, Automotive Software, State Space Exploration, Matlab Simulink, SPIN, Automotive Software |
| Link to License: | In Copyright |
Cite This
Files in this item
![[PDF]](/themes/Kops/images/mimes/pdf.png "PDF file"){kind=small}
LEITNER-FISCHER, Florian, 2008. Evaluation of the Matlab Simulink Design Verifier versus the model checker SPIN [Bachelor thesis]
@mastersthesis{LeitnerFischer2008Evalu-5603, title={Evaluation of the Matlab Simulink Design Verifier versus the model checker SPIN}, year={2008}, author={Leitner-Fischer, Florian} }
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/5603"> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/5603/1/Leitner_Evaluation_of_the_Matlab_Simulink_Design_Verifier_versus_the_model_checker_SPIN.pdf"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:creator>Leitner-Fischer, Florian</dc:creator> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T15:56:43Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:title>Evaluation of the Matlab Simulink Design Verifier versus the model checker SPIN</dcterms:title> <dcterms:issued>2008</dcterms:issued> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T15:56:43Z</dc:date> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/5603"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/> <dc:contributor>Leitner-Fischer, Florian</dc:contributor> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">An increasing number of industrial strength software design tools come along with verification tools that offer some property checking capabilities. On the other hand, there is a large number of general purpose model checking tools available. The question whether users of the industrial strength design tool preferably use the built-in verification tool or a general purpose model checking tool arises quite naturally. In this bachelor thesis, the Simulink Design Verifier and the SPIN model checking tool are compared. The comparison is based on the case study of an AUTOSAR compliant memory management module. The comparison is both functional in that it analyzes the suitability to verify a set of basic system properties, and quantitative in comparing the computational efficiency of both tools. In this context, it is also described how Simulink / Stateflow models can be manually translated into the input language of the model checker SPIN.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/5603/1/Leitner_Evaluation_of_the_Matlab_Simulink_Design_Verifier_versus_the_model_checker_SPIN.pdf"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Downloads since Oct 1, 2014 (Information about access statistics)
| Leitner_Evaluation_of_the_Matlab_Simulink_Design_Verifier_versus_the_model_checker_SPIN.pdf | 1305 |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Search KOPS
Browse
My Account
