Supporting Deliberative Systems with Referendums and Initiatives

Cite This

Files in this item

Checksum: MD5:cf7c804939f2ee5b6a326552f555db5e

EL-WAKIL, Alice, 2020. Supporting Deliberative Systems with Referendums and Initiatives. In: Journal of Deliberative Democracy. University of Westminster Press. 16(1), pp. 37-45. eISSN 2634-0488. Available under: doi: 10.16997/jdd.403

@article{elWakil2020-08-26Suppo-55035, title={Supporting Deliberative Systems with Referendums and Initiatives}, year={2020}, doi={10.16997/jdd.403}, number={1}, volume={16}, journal={Journal of Deliberative Democracy}, pages={37--45}, author={el-Wakil, Alice} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="" xmlns:dc="" xmlns:rdf="" xmlns:bibo="" xmlns:dspace="" xmlns:foaf="" xmlns:void="" xmlns:xsd="" > <rdf:Description rdf:about=""> <dcterms:title>Supporting Deliberative Systems with Referendums and Initiatives</dcterms:title> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="">2021-09-27T12:31:06Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Referendums and initiatives have long been described as deliberatively deficient and unfit to implement deliberative democracy. Categorized as aggregative mechanisms, they would undermine quality deliberation by setting predefined policy options to potentially polarizing mass votes, with no room for face-to-face exchange nor opportunities for citizens to develop informed judgments. Recent developments in deliberative democratic theory increasingly challenge this view. This article builds on this literature to argue that referendums and initiatives can serve deliberative systems by incentivising representatives to engage in recursive representation – namely, conversation-like exchange at the mass level with the represented deemed essential to deliberative systems. They do so by modifying the formal opportunity structure of representative actors, which impacts them in popular vote campaigns – but also over the long term. Acknowledging these long-term effects of systems including referendums and initiatives opens new questions that can guide further research on these processes’ value for deliberative democracy.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:issued>2020-08-26</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource=""/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource=""/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:contributor>el-Wakil, Alice</dc:contributor> <bibo:uri rdf:resource=""/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource=""/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="">2021-09-27T12:31:06Z</dc:date> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource=""/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource=""/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource=""/> <dc:creator>el-Wakil, Alice</dc:creator> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource=""/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Downloads since Sep 27, 2021 (Information about access statistics)

el-Wakil_2-zfolkoxv0u3c4.pdf 85

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Attribution 4.0 International Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International

Search KOPS


My Account