Laws for biscuits : Independence and dependence in conditionals

Cite This

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

GOEBEL, Arno, 2017. Laws for biscuits : Independence and dependence in conditionals. 27th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference : SALT 27. Maryland, May 12, 2017 - May 14, 2017. In: BURGDORF, Dan, ed., Jacob COLLARD, ed., Sireemas MASPONG, ed. and others. Proceedings of SALT 27. Washington, DC:Linguistic Society of America, pp. 377-396. ISSN 2163-5951. Available under: doi: 10.3765/salt.v27i0.4163

@inproceedings{Goebel2017biscu-53568, title={Laws for biscuits : Independence and dependence in conditionals}, year={2017}, doi={10.3765/salt.v27i0.4163}, issn={2163-5951}, address={Washington, DC}, publisher={Linguistic Society of America}, booktitle={Proceedings of SALT 27}, pages={377--396}, editor={Burgdorf, Dan and Collard, Jacob and Maspong, Sireemas}, author={Goebel, Arno} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/53568"> <dc:contributor>Goebel, Arno</dc:contributor> <dcterms:issued>2017</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-04-30T13:11:29Z</dcterms:available> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-04-30T13:11:29Z</dc:date> <dc:creator>Goebel, Arno</dc:creator> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Pragmatic theories of biscuit conditionals (BCs) claim that BCs have a standard conditional semantics and that the defining characteristics is a contextual assumption of independence. Intuitively there is no connection between antecedent and consequent. I argue that the standard formalization of independence is insuf- ficient. This is shown with the phenomenon of factual uses of conditionals where the antecedent is mutually accepted by discourse participants. The standard account is amended with a framework which represents dependencies between facts and ‘grounds’ the standard formalization in the independence of facts.</dcterms:abstract> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/53568"/> <dcterms:title>Laws for biscuits : Independence and dependence in conditionals</dcterms:title> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


Browse

My Account