Modal Structuralism and Reflection

Cite This

Files in this item

Checksum: MD5:dc35730a4f9b915c21ba448f42164192

ROBERTS, Sam, 2019. Modal Structuralism and Reflection. In: The Review of Symbolic Logic. Cambridge University Press. 12(4), pp. 823-860. ISSN 1755-0203. eISSN 1755-0211. Available under: doi: 10.1017/S1755020318000138

@article{Roberts2019Modal-53566, title={Modal Structuralism and Reflection}, year={2019}, doi={10.1017/S1755020318000138}, number={4}, volume={12}, issn={1755-0203}, journal={The Review of Symbolic Logic}, pages={823--860}, author={Roberts, Sam} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/53566"> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-04-30T12:56:00Z</dc:date> <dcterms:title>Modal Structuralism and Reflection</dcterms:title> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dc:contributor>Roberts, Sam</dc:contributor> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/53566/1/Roberts_2-1sve2a0zfnqcl1.pdf"/> <dc:creator>Roberts, Sam</dc:creator> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-04-30T12:56:00Z</dcterms:available> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:issued>2019</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Modal structuralism promises an interpretation of set theory that avoids commitment to abstracta. This article investigates its underlying assumptions. In the first part, I start by highlighting some shortcomings of the standard axiomatisation of modal structuralism, and propose a new axiomatisation I call MSST (for Modal Structural Set Theory). The main theorem is that MSST interprets exactly Zermelo set theory plus the claim that every set is in some inaccessible rank of the cumulative hierarchy. In the second part of the article, I look at the prospects for supplementing MSST with a modal structural reflection principle, as suggested in Hellman (2015). I show that Hellman’s principle is inconsistent (Theorem 5.32), and argue that modal structural reflection principles in general are either incompatible with modal structuralism or extremely weak</dcterms:abstract> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/53566/1/Roberts_2-1sve2a0zfnqcl1.pdf"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/53566"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Downloads since Apr 30, 2021 (Information about access statistics)

Roberts_2-1sve2a0zfnqcl1.pdf 15

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


Browse

My Account