Aufgrund von Vorbereitungen auf eine neue Version von KOPS, können derzeit keine Publikationen eingereicht werden. (Due to preparations for a new version of KOPS, no publications can be submitted currently.)

Clausal ellipsis : Deletion or selective spell-out?

Cite This

Files in this item

Checksum: MD5:6e49058f8562e787952b4bd72f1c27b8

BROEKHUIS, Hans, Josef BAYER, 2020. Clausal ellipsis : Deletion or selective spell-out?. In: Linguistics in the Netherlands. Benjamins. 37(1), pp. 23-37. ISSN 0929-7332. eISSN 1569-9919. Available under: doi: 10.1075/avt.00035.bro

@article{Broekhuis2020Claus-52949, title={Clausal ellipsis : Deletion or selective spell-out?}, year={2020}, doi={10.1075/avt.00035.bro}, number={1}, volume={37}, issn={0929-7332}, journal={Linguistics in the Netherlands}, pages={23--37}, author={Broekhuis, Hans and Bayer, Josef} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="" xmlns:dc="" xmlns:rdf="" xmlns:bibo="" xmlns:dspace="" xmlns:foaf="" xmlns:void="" xmlns:xsd="" > <rdf:Description rdf:about=""> <bibo:uri rdf:resource=""/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource=""/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dc:contributor>Broekhuis, Hans</dc:contributor> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This article compares two alternatives to the standard movement-and-deletion approach to clausal ellipsis, which postulates deletion of TP after the remnants of ellipsis are (sometimes exceptionally) A′-moved into the left periphery of the clause. One alternative is the in-situ approach, which denies the involvement of movement in the derivation of clausal ellipsis; it claims that clausal ellipsis can apply to any run-of-the-mill syntactic structure and simply deletes the familiar/given information from the propositional domain of the clause. Another alternative is the selective spell-out approach; it denies the involvement of deletion and states that the remnants undergo regular A′-movement into the specifiers of specific semantically relevant functional projections (CP, FocusP, NegP, etc.), which are subsequently selected for spell-out. This article argues that the selective spell-out approach is superior to the two deletion approaches.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource=""/> <dcterms:issued>2020</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource=""/> <dc:contributor>Bayer, Josef</dc:contributor> <dcterms:title>Clausal ellipsis : Deletion or selective spell-out?</dcterms:title> <dc:creator>Broekhuis, Hans</dc:creator> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource=""/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dc:creator>Bayer, Josef</dc:creator> <dc:date rdf:datatype="">2021-02-22T08:22:51Z</dc:date> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="">2021-02-22T08:22:51Z</dcterms:available> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource=""/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Downloads since Feb 22, 2021 (Information about access statistics)

Broekhuis_2-anhownznirs68.pdf 244

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


My Account