Die Grenzen der Solidarität : Regierungstechniken in Zeiten von Corona
| Type of Publication: | Journal article |
| Publication status: | Published |
| Author: | Drotbohm, Heike; Reichardt, Sven |
| Year of publication: | 2020 |
| Published in: | Geschichte und Gesellschaft : Zeitschrift für Historische Sozialwissenschaft ; 46 (2020), 3. - pp. 404-415. - Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. - ISSN 0340-613X. - eISSN 2196-9000 |
| DOI (citable link): | https://dx.doi.org/10.13109/gege.2020.46.3.404 |
| Title in another language: | The Limits of Solidarity : Technologies of Government in Times of Corona |
| Summary: |
This paper uses the COVID-19 pandemic to reflect on the relationship between governance and solidarity. It considers how a social model based on self-regulating individuals has been complemented by a new form of state dirigisme reliant on evocations of solidarity. However, this configuration may be approaching the limits of its viability. Given that governance relies on the robust internalization and execution of both care and control and on an ethos of renunciation, especially among the middle and upper classes, the paper proposes the need for analyses that better incorporate concepts of social inequality.
|
| Subject (DDC): | 320 Politics |
| Bibliography of Konstanz: | Yes |
| Refereed: | Yes |
Cite This
Files in this item
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
|
There are no files associated with this item. |
|||
DROTBOHM, Heike, Sven REICHARDT, 2020. Die Grenzen der Solidarität : Regierungstechniken in Zeiten von Corona. In: Geschichte und Gesellschaft : Zeitschrift für Historische Sozialwissenschaft. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. 46(3), pp. 404-415. ISSN 0340-613X. eISSN 2196-9000. Available under: doi: 10.13109/gege.2020.46.3.404
@article{Drotbohm2020Grenz-51725, title={Die Grenzen der Solidarität : Regierungstechniken in Zeiten von Corona}, year={2020}, doi={10.13109/gege.2020.46.3.404}, number={3}, volume={46}, issn={0340-613X}, journal={Geschichte und Gesellschaft : Zeitschrift für Historische Sozialwissenschaft}, pages={404--415}, author={Drotbohm, Heike and Reichardt, Sven} }
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/51725"> <dc:creator>Reichardt, Sven</dc:creator> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-11-10T16:22:00Z</dcterms:available> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/32"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dcterms:title>Die Grenzen der Solidarität : Regierungstechniken in Zeiten von Corona</dcterms:title> <dc:contributor>Reichardt, Sven</dc:contributor> <dc:language>deu</dc:language> <dcterms:alternative>The Limits of Solidarity : Technologies of Government in Times of Corona</dcterms:alternative> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dc:creator>Drotbohm, Heike</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Drotbohm, Heike</dc:contributor> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/32"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/51725"/> <dcterms:issued>2020</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="deu">This paper uses the COVID-19 pandemic to reflect on the relationship between governance and solidarity. It considers how a social model based on self-regulating individuals has been complemented by a new form of state dirigisme reliant on evocations of solidarity. However, this configuration may be approaching the limits of its viability. Given that governance relies on the robust internalization and execution of both care and control and on an ethos of renunciation, especially among the middle and upper classes, the paper proposes the need for analyses that better incorporate concepts of social inequality.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-11-10T16:22:00Z</dc:date> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Search KOPS
Browse
My Account
