Aufgrund von Vorbereitungen auf eine neue Version von KOPS, können kommenden Montag und Dienstag keine Publikationen eingereicht werden. (Due to preparations for a new version of KOPS, no publications can be submitted next Monday and Tuesday.)
Type of Publication: | Journal article |
Publication status: | Published |
URI (citable link): | http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-15ujczxlg9rpw0 |
Author: | Horn, Alexander |
Year of publication: | 2018 |
Published in: | Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis ; 20 (2018), 5. - pp. 451-468. - Taylor & Francis. - ISSN 1387-6988. - eISSN 1572-5448 |
DOI (citable link): | https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2017.1368192 |
Summary: |
Surveys show that welfare benefits are regarded as more legitimate if the beneficiaries are perceived as victims of systemic circumstances; that their legitimacy is sensitive to economic context; and that egalitarians are more supportive of benefits. Applying these insights to macro-comparative research, this paper shows that “conditional solidarity” – not partisanship – explains the puzzling countercyclical policy pattern of “conditionalization in good times” that characterizes changes in access to unemployment insurance in the OECD. The argument is that the effect of a government’s egalitarian views depends on the business cycle because the legitimacy of benefits is inversely related to macroeconomic performance.
|
Subject (DDC): | 320 Politics |
Keywords: | economic performance; comparative welfare research; conditional solidarity; egalitarianism; regression |
Link to License: | In Copyright |
Refereed: | Unknown |
HORN, Alexander, 2018. Conditional Solidarity : A Comparative Analysis of Government Egalitarianism and Benefit Conditionalization in Boom and Bust. In: Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis. Taylor & Francis. 20(5), pp. 451-468. ISSN 1387-6988. eISSN 1572-5448. Available under: doi: 10.1080/13876988.2017.1368192
@article{Horn2018-10-20Condi-50835, title={Conditional Solidarity : A Comparative Analysis of Government Egalitarianism and Benefit Conditionalization in Boom and Bust}, year={2018}, doi={10.1080/13876988.2017.1368192}, number={5}, volume={20}, issn={1387-6988}, journal={Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis}, pages={451--468}, author={Horn, Alexander} }
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/50835"> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/50835/1/Horn_2-15ujczxlg9rpw0.pdf"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-09-15T09:20:07Z</dcterms:available> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-09-15T09:20:07Z</dc:date> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/50835/1/Horn_2-15ujczxlg9rpw0.pdf"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dcterms:title>Conditional Solidarity : A Comparative Analysis of Government Egalitarianism and Benefit Conditionalization in Boom and Bust</dcterms:title> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/50835"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dc:contributor>Horn, Alexander</dc:contributor> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Surveys show that welfare benefits are regarded as more legitimate if the beneficiaries are perceived as victims of systemic circumstances; that their legitimacy is sensitive to economic context; and that egalitarians are more supportive of benefits. Applying these insights to macro-comparative research, this paper shows that “conditional solidarity” – not partisanship – explains the puzzling countercyclical policy pattern of “conditionalization in good times” that characterizes changes in access to unemployment insurance in the OECD. The argument is that the effect of a government’s egalitarian views depends on the business cycle because the legitimacy of benefits is inversely related to macroeconomic performance.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:issued>2018-10-20</dcterms:issued> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dc:creator>Horn, Alexander</dc:creator> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Horn_2-15ujczxlg9rpw0.pdf | 8 |