KOPS - The Institutional Repository of the University of Konstanz

"I like how it looks but it is not beautiful" : Sensory appeal beyond beauty

"I like how it looks but it is not beautiful" : Sensory appeal beyond beauty

Cite This

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

MUTH, Claudia, Jochen BRIESEN, Claus-Christian CARBON, 2020. "I like how it looks but it is not beautiful" : Sensory appeal beyond beauty. In: Poetics. Elsevier. 79, 101376. ISSN 0304-422X. eISSN 1872-7514. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2019.101376

@article{Muth2020-04looks-50438, title={"I like how it looks but it is not beautiful" : Sensory appeal beyond beauty}, year={2020}, doi={10.1016/j.poetic.2019.101376}, volume={79}, issn={0304-422X}, journal={Poetics}, author={Muth, Claudia and Briesen, Jochen and Carbon, Claus-Christian}, note={Article Number: 101376} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/50438"> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Statements such as “X is beautiful but I don’t like how it looks” or “I like how X looks but it is not beautiful” sound contradictory. How contradictory they sound might however depend on the object X and on the aesthetic adjective being used (“beautiful”, “elegant”, “dynamic”, etc.). In our study, the first sentence was estimated to be more contradictory than the latter: If we describe something as beautiful, we often intend to evaluate its appearance, whereas it is less counterintuitive to appreciate an appearance without finding it beautiful. Furthermore, statements including “beautiful” appeared more contradictory than those including “elegant” and “dynamic”, pointing to its greater evaluative component. When related to artworks, sentences could appear less contradictory due to readers’ consideration of the divergence between conventional beauty and art-related sensory pleasures that can even include negative valence. Such ambivalence might be more frequent in art-objects than in other artefacts. Indeed, in our study, sentences referring to artworks were estimated to be less contradictory when compared to sentences referring to other artefacts. Meanwhile, an additional small group of graphic design students showed a less clear difference between art-related and non-art-related sentences. We discuss the potential influence of art experience and interest as well as theoretical and methodological challenges like the conceptualization of beauty.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Carbon, Claus-Christian</dc:creator> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-08-04T12:56:35Z</dc:date> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dcterms:issued>2020-04</dcterms:issued> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dc:contributor>Briesen, Jochen</dc:contributor> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:title>"I like how it looks but it is not beautiful" : Sensory appeal beyond beauty</dcterms:title> <dc:contributor>Muth, Claudia</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Muth, Claudia</dc:creator> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-08-04T12:56:35Z</dcterms:available> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/50438"/> <dc:creator>Briesen, Jochen</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Carbon, Claus-Christian</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


My Account