KOPS - The Institutional Repository of the University of Konstanz

A conceptual map of invasion biology : Integrating hypotheses into a consensus network

A conceptual map of invasion biology : Integrating hypotheses into a consensus network

Cite This

Files in this item

Checksum: MD5:9f770f4bea66a3bfd0dc1c4555e776dc

ENDERS, Martin, Frank HAVEMANN, Florian RULAND, Maud BERNARD-VERDIER, Jane A. CATFORD, Lorena GÓMEZ-APARICIO, Sylvia HAIDER, Tina HEGER, Christoph KUEFFER, Mark VAN KLEUNEN, 2020. A conceptual map of invasion biology : Integrating hypotheses into a consensus network. In: Global Ecology and Biogeography. Wiley. 29(6), pp. 978-991. ISSN 1466-822X. eISSN 1466-8238. Available under: doi: 10.1111/geb.13082

@article{Enders2020-06conce-49380, title={A conceptual map of invasion biology : Integrating hypotheses into a consensus network}, year={2020}, doi={10.1111/geb.13082}, number={6}, volume={29}, issn={1466-822X}, journal={Global Ecology and Biogeography}, pages={978--991}, author={Enders, Martin and Havemann, Frank and Ruland, Florian and Bernard-Verdier, Maud and Catford, Jane A. and Gómez-Aparicio, Lorena and Haider, Sylvia and Heger, Tina and Kueffer, Christoph and van Kleunen, Mark} }

Catford, Jane A. Enders, Martin Enders, Martin Haider, Sylvia 2020-06 A conceptual map of invasion biology : Integrating hypotheses into a consensus network Ruland, Florian Gómez-Aparicio, Lorena Havemann, Frank Heger, Tina Background and aims<br />Since its emergence in the mid‐20th century, invasion biology has matured into a productive research field addressing questions of fundamental and applied importance. Not only has the number of empirical studies increased through time, but also has the number of competing, overlapping and, in some cases, contradictory hypotheses about biological invasions. To make these contradictions and redundancies explicit, and to gain insight into the field’s current theoretical structure, we developed and applied a Delphi approach to create a consensus network of 39 existing invasion hypotheses.<br /><br />Results<br />The resulting network was analysed with a link‐clustering algorithm that revealed five concept clusters (resource availability, biotic interaction, propagule, trait and Darwin’s clusters) representing complementary areas in the theory of invasion biology. The network also displays hypotheses that link two or more clusters, called connecting hypotheses, which are important in determining network structure. The network indicates hypotheses that are logically linked either positively (77 connections of support) or negatively (that is, they contradict each other; 6 connections).<br /><br />Significance<br />The network visually synthesizes how invasion biology’s predominant hypotheses are conceptually related to each other, and thus, reveals an emergent structure – a conceptual map – that can serve as a navigation tool for scholars, practitioners and students, both inside and outside of the field of invasion biology, and guide the development of a more coherent foundation of theory. Additionally, the outlined approach can be more widely applied to create a conceptual map for the larger fields of ecology and biogeography. 2020-05-04T13:18:50Z Haider, Sylvia Catford, Jane A. van Kleunen, Mark eng van Kleunen, Mark Heger, Tina Kueffer, Christoph Ruland, Florian 2020-05-04T13:18:50Z Bernard-Verdier, Maud Bernard-Verdier, Maud Havemann, Frank Gómez-Aparicio, Lorena Kueffer, Christoph terms-of-use

Downloads since May 4, 2020 (Information about access statistics)

Enders_2-tk6xik1s8u604.pdf 37

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


Browse

My Account