KOPS - The Institutional Repository of the University of Konstanz

The reversibility objection against the Second Law of thermodynamics viewed, and avoided, from a logical point of view

The reversibility objection against the Second Law of thermodynamics viewed, and avoided, from a logical point of view

Cite This

Files in this item

Checksum: MD5:b05ffef810fc422dde5255cf876f006a

MÜLLER, Thomas, 2019. The reversibility objection against the Second Law of thermodynamics viewed, and avoided, from a logical point of view. In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B : Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 66, pp. 52-61. ISSN 1355-2198. eISSN 1879-2502. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2018.09.002

@article{Muller2019-05rever-46273, title={The reversibility objection against the Second Law of thermodynamics viewed, and avoided, from a logical point of view}, year={2019}, doi={10.1016/j.shpsb.2018.09.002}, volume={66}, issn={1355-2198}, journal={Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B : Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics}, pages={52--61}, author={Müller, Thomas} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/46273"> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:contributor>Müller, Thomas</dc:contributor> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/46273/3/Mueller_2-h4ihu76p1pzj1.pdf"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/46273"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dc:creator>Müller, Thomas</dc:creator> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In this paper we offer a formal-logical analysis of the famous reversibility objection against the Second Law of thermodynamics. We reconstruct the objection as a deductive argument leading to a contradiction, employing resources of standard quantified modal logic and thereby highlighting explicit and implicit assumptions with respect to possibility, identity, and their interaction. We then describe an alternative framework, case-intensional first order logic, that has greater expressive resources than standard quantified modal logic. We show that in that framework we can account for the role of sortals in possibility judgments. This allows us to formalize the relevant truths involved in the reversibility objection in such a way that no contradiction ensues. We claim that this analysis helps to understand in which way the Second Law is, specifically, a law of thermodynamics, but not of systems of particles in general.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:title>The reversibility objection against the Second Law of thermodynamics viewed, and avoided, from a logical point of view</dcterms:title> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-07-09T14:51:38Z</dc:date> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/46273/3/Mueller_2-h4ihu76p1pzj1.pdf"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/page/termsofuse"/> <dcterms:issued>2019-05</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-07-09T14:51:38Z</dcterms:available> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Downloads since Jul 9, 2019 (Information about access statistics)

Mueller_2-h4ihu76p1pzj1.pdf 24

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


Browse

My Account